umm no it isn'tI was calling it out. Commonly used term on here - the repayment is immaterial
debt only disappears when it's paid off
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
umm no it isn'tI was calling it out. Commonly used term on here - the repayment is immaterial
20M per year is immaterial especially when it’s locked in on a v low long term
I haven't checked the figures but my assumption is that Man Utd have't really outspent us in recent years, at least since Conte has been manager we've spent quite a lot.
When we were winning more trophies in the 80s/90s I suspect that Man Utd had more funds than us then, so it's not all about money.
AFAIK the new stadium is being paid off on the long term and the amounts aren't really effecting the team, we're making much more money than we were in the old stadium.
Trust you to come up with this kind of response :contefacepalm2:
I said when we were winning more trophies in the 80s/90s (meaning more than we've won in the past decade or so) not that we were winning more than Man Utd then.They have.
We weren't winning more than Man U in the 90s.... That's a ridiculous claim.... They won the league FIVE times (let alone a shit load of other cups)!!!
.....Even in the 80's in was only 2 v 3 pots in our favour.
I wish I could, big work event at 7am on Thursday so can’t risk it.Right.
Massive allocation.
Nawty midweek away day.
Who’s going? And do you want some?
![]()
I said when we were winning more trophies in the 80s/90s (meaning more than we've won in the past decade or so) not that we were winning more than Man Utd then.
So what's ridiculous about that claim?
That’s sound!Just been reading a Blades forum and surprisingly total respect for us!!
Especially Kane, it's a welcome change from the usual vitriol online?
Let's hope they are promoted in place of West Ham.. Karma
Yes and no.You seem to be measuring us against Man U..... It read like that's what you meant.
If not, then I'm mistaken.
nah, we will lose easily without any false hope
Yes and no.
I'm measuring our trophy winning compared to Man Utd now, and back in the 80s/90s.
We did win trophies then agreed? And Man Utd were still a wealthier club then than we were.
So Man Utd winning the League cup last Sunday, and we got knocked out by Nottingham Forest beforehand isn't because they are more wealthy, because they were wealthy back in the 80's/90's but we still managed to win trophies despite their wealth.
See?
We buggered about with the line up in the league cup ( no idea why Perisic started up front ) & lostThere will need to be some rotation so I don't particularly agree. Don't be a Conte mark II! By some, I don't mean extensive, but some.
I see no harm in giving Porro / Danjuma / Richarlison some more game time when we can.
I'm not suggesting we play our 'YOOF' players
Do you think Man Utd have better players now than we do (taking into account all the pros and cons)?We got knocked out by Forest cos we dialed in a sloppy, lazy performance despite having a significantly more talented team on the pitch.
Like I already said.... The money gap is much bigger these days and trophies in England(+Wales) have been dominated by 3 teams over the last 30 years.
..............Do you have a broader point? You don't think think that is down to wealth and the accumulated stature/appeal/foothold that trickles down from that success?
Do you think Man Utd have better players now than we do (taking into account all the pros and cons)?
Since Ten-hag and Conte have been the managers of the two clubs and they have risen to 3rd in the league with a game in hand over us in forth , how much more money have they spent in the last two transfer windows than we have?
We've finished above them many times in the league recently with having 'less wealth'.
I don't think they are spending more now compared to us, than they were relatively so in the 1980s/90s.
I'd argue the only reason Man Utd now are in a better position now than we are is because we fucked up against Nottingham Forrest (Spursy) and have made stupid individual mistakes.
I don't see their team in top form as better than our team in top form, and I would not be overly eager to purchase any of their players.
Nope.