• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Next Manager Poll (poll reset 11/04/23)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Next Manager

  • Rodgers

    Votes: 15 3.6%
  • Potter

    Votes: 25 5.9%
  • Nagelsmann

    Votes: 177 41.9%
  • Kompany

    Votes: 43 10.2%
  • Slot

    Votes: 91 21.6%
  • Postecoglou

    Votes: 74 17.5%
  • De Zerbi

    Votes: 31 7.3%
  • Xabi Alonso

    Votes: 11 2.6%
  • Stellini

    Votes: 4 0.9%
  • Frank

    Votes: 10 2.4%
  • Luis Enrique

    Votes: 21 5.0%
  • Zidane

    Votes: 5 1.2%
  • Glasner

    Votes: 3 0.7%
  • Amorim

    Votes: 10 2.4%
  • Carrick

    Votes: 9 2.1%
  • Gallardo

    Votes: 23 5.5%
  • Schmidt

    Votes: 2 0.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

Fabrizio Romano has revealed in the most recent episode of the Here We Go Podcast (starting at 02:52) that Tottenham have settled on Arne Slot, Ruben Amorim and Ange Postecoglou as their top three candidates to replace Antonio Conte.
They have settled on that because every other fucker has ruled themselves out.
 
So Excited Flirting GIF


Who's starting the thread???

Billy Bob mate Billy Bob mate is itching to do it 😂
 
That's not what this says. Levy will be at the top of the pyramid no matter what. Whether he will be "signing off" on football decisions is just how you chose to interpret it.
I choose to interpret it that way because we have 20+ years of evidence pointing to that being the case and the man himself in the Amazon doc saying that the final decisions rest with him.

Does that mean it will definitely be the case this time? No.

Does it make it a high probability? Yes.

Let's remove bias here and look at it factually rather than getting defensive.
 
It doesn't matter how long it takes to appoint a manager. What matters is that he is in place on June 1st.
Not at all. Not if we've failed to get 2 or 3 proven coaches while we look for the "next big thing" only to fuck it up.
Take your time and do it right.
Don't take your time and still fuck it up.

Also, if there was annnnny chance we could have had Poch or Nagelsmann in after Conte went, we should have been all over it. Give them 10 games to suss out who's shit in real games and get shot of them. As it is, new coach N.E.Body, will only see them in July in training and friendlies. Same shit next season.
 
That's not what this says. Levy will be at the top of the pyramid no matter what. Whether he will be "signing off" on football decisions is just how you chose to interpret it.
I think we saw this with the Pedro Porro saga.

Even if Levy himself sincerely desires to step back from football decision making, you just kinda can't un-ring the bell of how personally involved he has been in transfer negotiations for decades now.

When you deal with Tottenham, you're dealing with Daniel Levy, which of course means brinksmanship and distrust and never-give-an-inch. That's the way every club in the world understands the situation, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy.
 
I choose to interpret it that way because we have 20+ years of evidence pointing to that being the case and the man himself in the Amazon doc saying that the final decisions rest with him.

Does that mean it will definitely be the case this time? No.

Does it make it a high probability? Yes.

Let's remove bias here and look at it factually rather than getting defensive.
You have absolutely no idea what that actually means in practicality though.
You don’t know if he is involved in setting an overall budget, individual budgets, something in between, transfer negotiations, contract negotiations, all or none. If you believe some of the posters here, Levy does everything but set up the cones in training. Yet not one poster here professes to have any experience of club management, have never set foot in a club front office, have no experience of ownership or, to my knowledge, even knows anyone who has. Their only experience is watching a highly edited docudrama on Amazon. The projection is pathetic.
 

Fabrizio Romano has revealed in the most recent episode of the Here We Go Podcast (starting at 02:52) that Tottenham have settled on Arne Slot, Ruben Amorim and Ange Postecoglou as their top three candidates to replace Antonio Conte.
been think since they said its not JN, that Levy would go for Postecglou he knows the asian market so Levy would hope we can sign the next "Sonny" that could give Levy full houses each week without fans moaning about winning games
 
been think since they said its not JN, that Levy would go for Postecglou he knows the asian market so Levy would hope we can sign the next "Sonny" that could give Levy full houses each week without fans moaning about winning games
Yeah, it’s not as if ’Postecglou’ (sp) hasn’t been a serial winner literally everywhere he has coached.
His only remit is to find an Asian player so we can sell out Daejeon stadium in the off-season and attract tourists
 
You have absolutely no idea what that actually means in practicality though.
You don’t know if he is involved in setting an overall budget, individual budgets, something in between, transfer negotiations, contract negotiations, all or none. If you believe some of the posters here, Levy does everything but set up the cones in training. Yet not one poster here professes to have any experience of club management, have never set foot in a club front office, have no experience of ownership or, to my knowledge, even knows anyone who has. Their only experience is watching a highly edited docudrama on Amazon. The projection is pathetic.

George, this entire post reeks of bias I am afraid and you aren't seeing this from a neutral perspective, it just comes across as defensive because your setting impossible standards to meet for criticism to be valid.

Daniel Levy is the chairman of the football club, it is common knowledge at this point that he has had personal input on deals for players and also has made club signings (why would managers not play players that they wanted to sign? That makes no logical sense.)

It is also common knowledge from interviews with previous employees that he has actively stopped transfers from happening even against recommendations from people with more knowledge than him on the subject, for what reasons we don't know, but it has happened, that is a fact.


He himself in the documentary said that he has the final say on matters, he said it about the hiring of Pochettino and that he got "lucky".

He has also said in his most recent letter to the supporters that ultimately the blame is his.

It seems you want personal verification, 24 hour a day camera access to his personal life and a hand written letter from Daniel Levy himself about what he does at the football club before you even begin to acknowledge that he MAY have a negative impact on the footballing decisions at this club.

Whilst I agree that it's likely nobody here has worked with him or knows the true inner workings of the club, if that is the bar that has to be met in order for people to come to conclusions based on other evidence that doesn't meet that criteria, then we will NEVER have anything remotely verifiable, it's an impossible bar to meet and I think it's set that way because it comes from a place of rigid bias.

Levy would NEVER explain in detail what he does at this club day in/day out and expose himself to criticism, it would be incredibly stupid to do such a thing.

This is my personal opinion, Levy should have NO input on footballing matters whatsoever, he should set a budget for the football side of matters and let the experts do their fucking job within that budget and remit, end of discussion.

Anything else is just a continuation of what we have already seen and which we know to be failing.
 
Last edited:
George, this entire post reeks of bias I am afraid and you aren't seeing this from a neutral perspective, it just comes across as defensive because your setting impossible standards to meet for criticism to be valid.

Daniel Levy is the chairman of the football club, it is common knowledge at this point that he has had personal input on deals for players and also has made club signings (why would managers not play players that they wanted to sign? That makes no logical sense.)

It is also common knowledge from interviews with previous employees that he has actively stopped transfers from happening even against recommendations from people with more knowledge than him on the subject, for what reasons we don't know, but it has happened, that is a fact.

So you think he should just set an overall transfer budget, say 150m this summer, presumably an overall wage budget and then just leave it up to his DoF to spend as he sees fit?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top