There are about 5 or 6 Levy In posters who have posted regularly -There really isn't, your bias is blinding you I am afraid.
Both sides have come up with great factual arguments at times and those are appreciated.
But to suggest that the side that wants Levy in is always coming from a place of pure factual evidence is simply incorrect.
This is why I say this debate isn't about facts anymore, it's about sides, it shares a lot in common with left vs right politics and Brexit etc.
So, I am Levy out, do you believe I speak to entrenched positions when I say that I think Levy has done a fantastic job on the business side but I no longer trust his judgement when it comes to footballing decisions and he needs to step aside for the good of the football club?
Because my decision making process is based on the evidence of decline that I am seeing at the football club.
Only arguable one is professional contrarian
There are maybe 15/16 regular posters who are ENIC Out and maybe 2 or 3 of those who appeal to reason and evidence. The rest dismissively say the time for discussion has passed or cherry pick the contextual factors that help their argument whilst brazenly ignoring others. That’s not fair.
So yes, your characterisation is a false equivalence.
And to be absolutely clear it is possible to be ENIC out by appealing to evidence and reason and you have expressed yourself very well.
Ultimately if this has turned into a kind of frustrating politics then it’s because most people are not engaging in good faith. On that we agree. But it’s not really both sides - if this is going to be useful we need both sides to agree to the kind of discourse you promote.
