• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nothing about Kulusevski's game would indicate that he's more natural on the left wing.
Yeah I'm baffled at that assessment, Kulu literally lives off cutting inside and finding an incisive pass into space with his strong left foot, asking him to beat a man and find a pass or cross out on the touchline is seriously not in his repertoire. He could maybe play the 10 role given time but I actually think hes somewhat wasted there, he's not really a goalscorer and you want a 10 to be chipping in with 15 a season at least. There's time for him to add goals to his game but right now he's gotta be playing off the right finding the right man in space with his great long passing. If we can get Kulusevski back to his early form people will be buzzing off him again. I don't think he's been "found out" just had a shit time with injury and tactics being gash.
 
Teams across all leagues will be tinkering with what Guardiola did this past season with his full backs, and Stones moving into midfield. Woolwich were at it most of the year with Ben White and Zinchenko. Postecoglou (going on small sample size of probably 10-12 games watched since we appointed him) doesn't have just the one way of utilizing full backs. Sometimes both bomb forward high and wide, sometimes one will sit beside cb's for most of the game, sometimes one will repeatedly make underlapping runs (inside winger into box), often the left back will come insde and spend the whole game rotating possession from a defensive midfield position. We have a wide variety of skillsets at full back, with our right backs in particular its a shame we don't have European games to give them all a fair go of it. Emerson, Porro, Spence all good at different things. Left back I'm a bit worried about, I thought Davies was a decent lcb in a three, don't really think he's much good in a back four.. Udogie is a developing, unrefined player and Reguilon/Sessegnon can't be counted on, but wouldnt be totally surprised if Ange decided he liked one or the other.

Defensive deficiencies aside, why can't Porro play as an inverted RB?

In Ange's system, doesn't the RB sit in a midfield 3 behind the 5 attacking players? From that position, he's be in a prime position to pick out a cross, overlap with a one of the 8s or even have a long shot. He's capable of all three of these things.

This is an actual question. Seems like Porro operating from the MF like TAA did late last season would suit him quite well.
 
Levy has some sort of pathological need to leave us light in at least one position. For years we've been crying out for a proper CB.

The fact that Sanchez wasn't fit to succeed Toby and Jan was obvious from his second season here, but Levy did nothing to move him on. Then we got Rodon instead of Skiriniar, god know how much that cost us.

He finally got Romero, but then had us playing with Davies and Dier as his partners, what a joke. We then failed to get Bastoni and chose fucking Lenglet on loan.
He’s spent money. But he’s mostly bought shite. Still lands on his shoulders because he employs the people that waste million on pap. Even when we get it right we hold onto players for too long And he would rather keep shite beyond its sell by date than cut losses and move on.
That is small time and an unwillingness to accept mistakes.
 
I don’t think he’s arrogant. I think he’s a bit like Danny Rose and has a chip on his shoulder. He’s a confident chap too which I think makes him come across as a dick.

I think for a while he was visibly a bit of a twat.... Posing with cars and getting too caught up in image; in danger of disappearing down the footballing plug-hole a bit like Dele, Lingard and few other English lads of this generation.

However somewhere around 2 years ago he started to come across as a lot more mature in his interviews...... Perhaps getting exiled by Southgate after getting busted in that Casino woke him up a bit... If not that then fatherhood (2021 and birth of second child expected Jul 2023).
 
Last edited:
Defensive deficiencies aside, why can't Porro play as an inverted RB?

In Ange's system, doesn't the RB sit in a midfield 3 behind the 5 attacking players? From that position, he's be in a prime position to pick out a cross, overlap with a one of the 8s or even have a long shot. He's capable of all three of these things.

This is an actual question. Seems like Porro operating from the MF like TAA did late last season would suit him quite well.
He seems quite poor on the ball outside of his passing. Gives the ball away under pressure. We also have better options than converting him to CM. As a DM Skipp is far far superior, as B2B Bissouma and Benta are better, and Maddison (if we get him) would be far better as a creative/goal scoring CM.
 
For a WB. I seem to recall quite a few wild shots into row z. Though, compared to Kulu, who is exceptionally shot shy and quite poor when he does try, Porro does seem the better option in that regard.

I'm convinced that's down to Conte... He wasn't at all shot-shy when he first arrived.. That curler on his left from inside the box was a bit of a trademark on his highlight real and remained so during his original 6 month hot-streak here.

Sonny also spoke of himself not shooting as much and trying to bring that back to his game after Conte left.
 
He so fits a 433 he would be the furtherest forward in a mid field triangle with two hybrids 8s of benta and biss behind him
I don't think he plays that, he played McGregor as a 6 at Celtic.

Bissouma is made for the 6, Bentancur the 8. That leaves Maddison as a 10. It can work, but we might get run over.

IMO we ain't seeing Bentancur until January. It'll take a month for him to be match fit so February, which means in the meantime we need probably play Sarr there.

Or rotate Skipp into the 6 and Bissouma to 8.
 
Last edited:
its not like its a hugggggggge investment, 80 mill for 2 cb's that could be here for 10 yrs more then pays it back

what we cannot do is fuck around waiting for them to lower the asking price for weeks otherwise they get snapped up elsewhere
 
I'm convinced that's down to Conte... He wasn't at all shot-shy when he first arrived.. That curler on his left from inside the box was a bit of a trademark on his highlight real and remained so during his original 6 month hot-streak here.

Sonny also spoke of himself not shooting as much and trying to bring that back to his game after Conte left.

With a grand total of 5 less shots last season compared to the one before. In less minutes.

Love Son but that crap was all just convenient, manager blaming excuses for the fact he had an individually mediocre season.
 

That's just getting carried away to TBH.....

Yes, we need a significant upgrade in 2 CB berths, but bringing in a bunch of young CBs without the sufficient amount of games to support their development is just a recipe to wreck another player a la Tanganga.

Dropping a combined 80m on both of them would make us so much more balanced.

Dunno about it specifically bringing balance, but we certainly the necessary upgrade in quality/depth.
 
Whenever Bardi is on the overlap fan debate, he comes across as a proper tool who doesn't know what he is talking about. I would take the countless Serie A watchers opinion of Vicario over his any day of the week and theirs has been very positive.
Ah he seems like a decent lad. Most of us have opinions, and we all get some right and some wrong. Fair play to anybody who manages to make a few pound on the side talking about a hobby.

There's some legitimate concerns about Vicario but he looks to be a talented keeper, a big upgrade for us in possession of the ball, and if he's up to the level it will have been a good deal that hopefully allows us to spend bigger on other important positions.
 
Back
Top