• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    209
Newcastle’s ownership is “a sovereign instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”. Nobody who loves Tottenham should want the club to be part of the propaganda department for a country that executes people for being gay
Wether you're right or wrong, you'd probably agree that the vast, overwhelming majority of Newcastle fans are excited by the new ownership and would never swap them for a return of Mike Ashley.
Likewise Man City fans
To believe (or expect), the vast majority of the Spurs fanbase would somehow be any different in such an event is wishful thinking, and naive.
And we all know Levy and Lewis would sell to the highest bidder. Just like Ashley.
So any grounds for keeping ENIC based on some moral principles simply don't exist.
 
Last edited:
Are F’in kidding me Levybot?!?!? You talking about morality when Joe Lewis is your majority owner?!?

A man who has fenced off public land in Argentina and had his private security goons beat to bloody pulp anyone trying access the land. Bribed local officials so court orders aren’t enforced and threatened people on peaceful marches onto the public land with gun violence?!?

A man who gives his employees illegal stock tips to avoid paying a them pensions and has tanked/shorted the currency of his own country causing the economic suffering to millions.

Lewis a f’in Bond villain- You don’t care about morality if you’re sticking up for ENIC.

A word of advice to the Levybot programmers - probably best just to avoid the topic of morality since Joe Lewis your patron.

I have “you” on ignore but spouting self righteousness while supporting Lewis was too much hypocrisy/idiocy to not respond - when I caught the gist from post responses. Back on ignore.

For the record, I don’t want a Gulf state purchasing the club either but we’re already owned by a morally bankrupt human being so get off it …
"Levybot "

"On ignore"

But still finds time to comment on my post.

Anyone who starts with "Levybot" has nothing of value to add to a debate.
 
Go back and read my post again, and then when you've done that read it a 3rd time.

Then come back to me with the bit that you have either missed, or are deliberately ignoring.
You said you were against Saudi/Quatari owners.


Do you agree there could be a good Saudi or Quatari wealthy buisness person or in your opinion are they all slave drivers etc...?
 
But so long as the fans are happy because

We won't do a Leeds
It's not Alan Sugar
They're not Arabs
They don't kill People ?
We haven’t been relegated
The beer pours from the bottom
All billionaires are shady / dodgy anyway
Levy claims to be a lifelong fan

Then business continues and we're all good.
It’s hilarious that you think not killing people is some ridiculous standard. God forbid we don’t want oppressive regimes owning our club.

What are those ENICbots like huh?
 
You said you were against Saudi/Quatari owners.


Do you agree there could be a good Saudi or Quatari wealthy buisness person or in your opinion are they all slave drivers etc...?
I fully agree with your statement. There can be good owners or wealthy business people from any country. Those people have yet to materialise to in football.
 
Because anyone who starts with Levybot is not interested in having a serious debate.

It's quite simple really.

I've already stated what my red line is on the subject.

But just for you I'll try and debate one point he made
Trigger Reaction GIF by MOODMAN


Ignore that comment and grow up
 
Quote just one post of mine where I've supported Lewis or defended his actions.
I don’t think I’ve see you say so but one could argue ( not that I am ) that saying “ new owners could be worse “ is supporting the status quo .

Im kind of past caring these day but it is nice to know that it’s proven that our lot are less than clean & I can add that to the list of incompetence etc
 
You said you were against Saudi/Quatari owners.


Do you agree there could be a good Saudi or Quatari wealthy buisness person or in your opinion are they all slave drivers etc...?
Oh dear, obviously comprehension isn't for everyone.

Here's the bit you missed or are ignoring;

I do not want any owners from Saudi/Qatar who support those regimes.
The same goes for any other owners from any other countries that have similar regime's.
This, obviously, implies that I'd be ok with someone from those countries who do not support them.
 
Back
Top