Sure, not in terms of the window but are you attempting to suggest that losing your best player 3 days before the start of season would NOT be considered a "late bid" by 99% of fans for other teams?If the Kane news is true, accepting a late bid
Late bid? Is it the final week of the transfer window?
Neither did we say he was for sale either. And the same machinations and leaks happened during the City summer and there was NO negotiation. The only public this was Pep saying there was no negotiation but other than that it was the same rumours that your are dismissing now.This should really read as 'wasn't for sale' when taking into account any awareness of how the transfer market works. Were we really going to just publicly state that Kane was for sale? Would that have helped us negotiate a better/faster price? Do me a favour. Appealing to the fee fees of our fans speculating on social media was hardly going to be the priority.
This is fun.
Again, now the whispers are invalid, huh? I bet I could search your post history and find multiple posts informed by these whispers...but now you're getting all epistemological here...everyone's seen the reports of 100M...Was he not for sale or did we have an indicated price? I'm trying to keep track here.
Again - club caught in not selling player for their highball response scandal
who fucking cares who did it...but in evaluating the situation only a moron would think Bayern would have anything to gain from leaking it as it clearly puts MORE public pressure on Kane, right?Is this particularly egregious? Did we leak it to the press that we'd agreed a fee or (far more likely) did Bayern?
So waht was your point?
Is there a point in there? Probably not because it's eminently reasonable to conclude what he did with the factual points he made. Factual points, I might add, that you have barely scratched with your rebuttal.