The back up to Richarlison is Son playing through the middle. What we need is someone who can compete for the first team spot with a real chance of taking the shirt, I still think Vlahovic is the obvious choice.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
The back up to Richarlison is Son playing through the middle. What we need is someone who can compete for the first team spot with a real chance of taking the shirt, I still think Vlahovic is the obvious choice.
Couldn't give a fuck about their profit. Would love it if they actually tried to compete financially instead of looking for miracles from managers.
OK.... What striker.......? We're back at square one.........
....................BUT; 50m over the value is not a "little over the odds".
Right now, but obviously it's not ideal for a starter in one position to be a backup for another position. E.g. if Ange wants to sub Richarlison off in the 70th minute to freshen up our attack he doesn't really have anyone to put on right now.The back up to Richarlison is Son playing through the middle. What we need is someone who can compete for the first team spot with a real chance of taking the shirt, I still think Vlahovic is the obvious choice.
It was rubbish anyway. Rice isn't a 50m player in this market.
Caicedo has gone for 110m. Lavia is going for 60. Rice is HG AND at least as good as Caicedo.
They overpaid but not by much. And within 3-4 years people probably won't even look on it as overpaying as the market is shifting again and 100m transfers won't be a remotely big deal for the top 6 teams soon.
Right now, but obviously it's not ideal for a starter in one position to be a backup for another position. E.g. if Ange wants to sub Richarlison off in the 70th minute to freshen up our attack he doesn't really have anyone to put on right now.
I'm torn between wanting to give this front 3 a run in the team versus the desire to give a look to other players.Shift Sonny accross and bring on Solomon or Perisic...... Or Porro.......
That doesn't freshen up anything, Sonny is 31 and would need to be subbed off earlier than Richy if anything.Shift Sonny accross and bring on Solomon or Perisic...... Or Porro.......
OK.... What striker.......? We're back at square one.........
....................BUT; 50m over the value is not a "little over the odds".
FUCK SAKE. WE'VE BEEN LINKED WITH ORBAN FOR A WEEK AND HE STILL HASN'T FUCKING SCORED FOR US. ABSOLUTE PASSENGER AGAINST BRENTFORD.
ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT, CHAMPIONSHIP CLOGGER.
WHY THE FUCK HAVEN'T WE SIGNED MBAPPE.

Not my numbers mate; they're the other dude's....... Besides the concept being debated remains the same.
That doesn't freshen up anything, Sonny is 31 and would need to be subbed off earlier than Richy if anything.
...But you could just sub off Son and get a better effect, it doesn't solve anything. You don't have fresh legs to bring in for Richarlison, so the problem remains.Of course it does......... 1 player off / 1 set of fresh legs on.
Just newspaper talk at the moment.
I'm torn between wanting to give this front 3 a run in the team versus the desire to give a look to other players.
...But you could just sub off Son and get a better effect, it doesn't solve anything. You don't have fresh legs to bring in for Richarlison, so the problem remains.
Because Son is older and plays on the wing, both imply that he would need to be subbed off before Richy, so if you want to only sub one player off subbing Richy instead of Son is going to be less effective.Why is it to "better effect"? It's just different.
One would assume you typically change a CF to give the CBs something a little different to handle, not that they've gassed out.