Bournemouth spending over £100 million on players yet we are still dicking about.
View: https://twitter.com/AdamLeventhal/status/1692481256829633015?s=20
Something is seriously wrong.
Another smart signing by Bmuff.
They are the new Brentford imo
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Bournemouth spending over £100 million on players yet we are still dicking about.
View: https://twitter.com/AdamLeventhal/status/1692481256829633015?s=20
Something is seriously wrong.
Another smart signing by Bmuff.
They are the new Brentford imo
Suspect they get a shock result at Anfield this weekend and people start taking noticeDefinitely assembling a decent squad with a young progressive coach. Promotion, done well.
Better than Dier.To tell the truth I hate to see him go. He's a very good backup CB
It's always better than nothing, on the whole though I'd prefer just inserting reasonable buy backs, I suppose there's a fine line there though in that if it's too low the buying club would feel less incentive to develop the player knowing that it's just a glorified loan if the player kicks on.I'm not talking about a broader attempt to establish an income stream; just addressing a predicament to minimise any loss and/or maximise the outcome from a player that suddenly it appears we don't have a use for,
We could ad 20% for example (CP were happy to do so for Eze)... There's nothing to say it couldn't be even higher still..... There are no rules per say.
eg:
15m +25% sell on >>>>>>> Eventually CP sell for 40m... We get 10m and Palace still double their money..... Or we can buy back at 30m and Palace are still doubling their outlay.
..........Or if he doesn't become a start; CP just end up with a RB worth roughly what they paid.
I'd say that would be agreeable to all parties.
If the club do not bring in a proven goal scorer to replace Kane before the window ends, I honestly think they will have failed Ange on the same if not bigger scale than they fucked Ramos over when we sold Berbatov and Keane.I just dont understand what is going on, it is utterly bizarre. We are setting the manager up to fail. If we have a bad start and they sack him then the fans wont be against the manager this time.
Well I'm not convinced by Richarlison, even as far back as when he played for Everton, Son has been off form since our pre season to Korea last year, and Kulesevski has been quite poor apart from his first six months when he arrived from Jueventus. So I'm adding the Brentford game to that.
City move for Paqueta apparently off. You'd imagine this raises the chances of then pushing through the Doku deal, and I wonder if it makes them turn to Eze. Profiles very similarly to Grealish but with more goalscoring ability and (to this point) less ball retention.
Two weeks today the window shuts isn't it.The excuse next week will be that we couldnt get our targets, because the buying clubs couldnt tee up replacements, as it is too late in the window. All because we have been too slow sorting things out.
Can see it coming a mile off. Part of the problem was highlighted in the Athletic the other day
It should also be pointed out that a club’s reputation can have a big effect on how easy or hard it is to sell players. (...) it’s amazing how different perceptions are of players when they’re at a club deemed to be a good place for them to develop. (He refers to how Man City can receive good money for their fringe players). And the opposite can be true — as Spurs have demonstrated. Tottenham’s struggles over recent years make it even harder to sell unwanted players because there’s no real sense from prospective buyers that it’s been a place where individuals have been well coached or picked up good habits. Until this perception changes and until big contracts that were handed out pre-Covid expire, selling players will remain a particularly acute problem for Spurs.
They are probably waiting for a bargain to suddenly appear.Why are we looking at wingers again when a new CB must be the priority. Surely we know who we want by now.
EXACTLY. hiring these win-now scorched earth coaches affects this.The excuse next week will be that we couldnt get our targets, because the buying clubs couldnt tee up replacements, as it is too late in the window. All because we have been too slow sorting things out.
Can see it coming a mile off. Part of the problem was highlighted in the Athletic the other day
It should also be pointed out that a club’s reputation can have a big effect on how easy or hard it is to sell players. (...) it’s amazing how different perceptions are of players when they’re at a club deemed to be a good place for them to develop. (He refers to how Man City can receive good money for their fringe players). And the opposite can be true — as Spurs have demonstrated. Tottenham’s struggles over recent years make it even harder to sell unwanted players because there’s no real sense from prospective buyers that it’s been a place where individuals have been well coached or picked up good habits. Until this perception changes and until big contracts that were handed out pre-Covid expire, selling players will remain a particularly acute problem for Spurs.
Doku transfer was independant of Paqueta apparently, the Mahrez replacement/Grealish rotation. Paqueta a Gundogan replacement /Kdb alternate. Eze is kind of between the two, could play Lw or offensive 8If they get Doku instead of Paq why would that in turn make them more likely to sign Eze?
We need wingers that can dribble, a striker that can score, a rotationalWhy are we looking at wingers again when a new CB must be the priority. Surely we know who we want by now.
Same behaviour from the board every season. Such short term thinking hence the bloated squad and the amount of deadwood we need to shift.So a week on from the Kane sale and nothing seems close. 2 weeks to go and so much to do.
Shambles really.
This sell to buy thing is such a cop out. Get the players in that are needed for your new manager to succeed.
If no one wants to buy our dross I'm sure we can loan them somewhere and save on wages.
Maybe there are a couple that refuse to go out on loan so banish them to train with the kids. (I don't think we have those types of characters anyway).
The opportunity cost of not giving Ange what he needs is way higher than swallowing the wages of a couple of the deadwood for a season.
Such short-term thinking to not act.
Not sure Eze is a Pep player though.Doku transfer was independant of Paqueta apparently, the Mahrez replacement/Grealish rotation. Paqueta a Gundogan replacement /Kdb alternate. Eze is kind of between the two, could play Lw or offensive 8