I think we agree to disagree but we did sign Kulusevski !
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
I think we agree to disagree but we did sign Kulusevski !
Recency? Kulu has played like this for a year.
LOL U wot?
That will be activated at the end of the 2022-23 season if two conditions are met during the campaign: that Kulusevski plays in 50% of the team’s Premier League matches for at least 45 minutes, and Spurs qualify for the Champions League.
Would you rather looks or output?
Or sell us Johnson for £50m now with the understanding they will spend £10m on Dav/Dier spread over 5 years.
Sales count straight away for FFP whereas purchases can be amortised. Spurs get a £40m deal and Forest can show £48m profit in year one
Not ideal, but we can always hold on to Dav, if we don't sign someone. He'll be a serviceable option in Ange's system.
I'd rather both. "Looks" is being able to contribute to the overall play, not doing tricks on the pitch.
yeh mate Gil is phenomenal. Its only because of lack of opportunity that he's not prospered (even though he's not done anything meaningful when given the chance).
Whilst Johnson got his 8 premier league goals and 3 assist Bryan Gil managed 2 la liga goals and 2 assists in a league he's apparently comfortable playing in. The season before that he had 0 goals and 1 assist.
Currently he's a nothing player with the occasional fancy trick but lacks end product. He's the modern day Jose Dominguez. Can he improve? maybe but I very much doubt it will be with us.
It's quite evident Kulusevski gets a bad rap because he's not aesthetically pleasing to watch. Despite his output for us.
1 G&A each.... Diaby played one more game (he drew a blank in Europe this week).
The only question marks over GLC are from TFC posters. I doubt he'd be in Ange's plans if the manager had question marks about him.
As for Skipp, what should we do? Sell him and keep Højbjerg? Or sell him and Højbjerg and buy someone else (who would also have to be HG)?
No way, he was getting world class shouts when he was getting good output two seasons ago, outside of the output he also contributed a lot, he carried the ball, dribbled, pulled the strings of our attack, he hasn't done any of that for a while.
Actually the payment terms for the player we sell them is NOT important for FFP.
What is brought into FFP is the annual amortisation - so if tyhe player sold was valued at £15m on a 5 year contract it would mean £3m pa amortisation in year 1 but £50m profit on Johnson
Nope, I'm Spurs.