-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
It's a bit naive to suggest that the striker we put up top wouldn't change the way we build up in the final third. If we had a massive bustard like Lukaku up there you can guarantee we'd be putting in far more crosses, if Kane was still here you would see interchange between him and Maddison.
Ive not completely written off Richy but his lack of involvement in shots is as much if not more down to him having an average to poor touch, not great in the air and not an especially gifted dribbler or very quick. If we were to set up just to feed him in the box we would get far less team goals, we need either Richy contributing more with 3rd man runs and offering a meaningful presence in the box, or replace him with someone who can offer that.
I have.
I rate Diaby. It's his first season in the prem. Kulu looked world class after his first half a season.
Deleted member 15314
Guest
We don't know that. We're in a very competitive league. Newcastle look very good, as do Villa. Liverpool are still a top 4 contender. City and Arse go without saying. United and Chavs are shit but they may still come good.
Brighton can't be ruled out yet either.
I literally guarantee it. I have seen him play full matches and Orban is nowhere near Haaland.
Yeah, and this season Kulusevski does not look world class, meanwhile Diaby is sharp, mobile, and constantly getting into dangerous areas.
As backup to Micky?
It would be fucking hilarious. A massive surprise if he goes but they are offering him unbelievable money.
Never said he was, simply stating a fact, you can't write him off before he's kicked a ball in this country mate.
Revealed: the deal Spurs struck with Juventus to buy Dejan Kulusevski
Tottenham have two clauses to buy Dejan Kulusevski from Juventus as part of their loan deal for the midfielder
www.theguardian.com
Agreed we reduced the final sum paid a little, but report is quite clear on an obligation if CL gained and Kulusevski playing in more than 50% of PL matches
No... That wasn't the case... The clause evidently transpired to have related to his 2nd season. Even Kulu himself said at the end of last season that his future was uncertain.
Secondly, it was a fixed price with the obligation clause... If it was met we wouldn't have been able to negotiate a lower price with Juve a month or so into the trf window.
Last edited:
So if we had sold Harry on June 5th, you'd be ok, but because we sold him August 11th you're not ok? Even though, from the off, Ange was planning for the season without Kane?
Okaaayyy....
As prev stated it was an obligation to buy if conditions were met, and they were.
There WAS an obligation clause... It just didn't get met. THAT is why we got to negotiate anew deal.
his movement is better because its better.
They were not met, we did not qualify for the CL last season.