It's especially stupid cause we were literally in a bidding war with Brentford in the summer over Brennan Johnson.Yeah, just like the last signing we made
The stuff some of you lot come out with.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
It's especially stupid cause we were literally in a bidding war with Brentford in the summer over Brennan Johnson.Yeah, just like the last signing we made
The stuff some of you lot come out with.
Fucking hell, so this is why so many people think they know so much about players they've never seen. They pay to subscribe to something called WyScout. FFS
Fucking hell, so this is why so many people think they know so much about players they've never seen. They pay to subscribe to something called WyScout. FFS
Ok mate
Are you not one of the mob punting us to spend 50 million on Gallagher? We spent 50 on BJ and 60 on Richarlison...Point still stands, we're not spending that sort of money for 'cover'
I mean the club strategy, it's a terrible way to do business.
It maybe, but surely football clubs have actual, paid and proper analysts to interpret the data to identify who the club want. Not some random satbin his mums basement
Yeah, just like the last signing we made
The stuff some of you lot come out with.
View: https://x.com/david_ornstein/status/1751879150824980746?s=46&t=DK3x3JffKkqwqcsQdIeO_A
Chelsea hawking Gallagher out again
Jacob Ramsey is certainly a new name.
Villa wouldn't sell to rivals though, surely?
Yet we just signed Dragusin rather than walking away when Bayern tabled a bid and the player (very sensibly in my view) took some time to consider what was best for him. :/ Utter made-up agenda-driven nonsense.The club's strategy appears to be, that we go after a target, if we are able to get a clear run at them.
They seem to want, a player to be all in on them, with no other clubs involved, so no bidding war which increases the amount.
I think it's quite risky and limited, relying on a target not changing their mind, like we have just seen.
I guess this has been a Levy policy, to ensure we don't pay too much, but Kane will need to be replaced, and another year or two so will son, that is going to cost a bit is the club ready.
The problem people do not see was Nusa was a luxury if we could get him because he is still very raw. So we made an enquiry but had a price and what Brugge were asking was above the price.Yet we just signed Dragusin rather than walking away when Bayern tabled a bid and the player (very sensibly in my view) took some time to consider what was best for him. :/ Utter made-up agenda-driven nonsense.
Yeah but Johnson has a mangina
EVERYTHING stinks about ManC!Unless you are Manchester City.
And why there hasn't been more scrutiny over the Haaland deal is beyond me. That stinks to high heaven.
Thought that was Jackie Grealish?
It's really our best route to develop the team. When those chances come around we should take them.The problem people do not see was Nusa was a luxury if we could get him because he is still very raw. So we made an enquiry but had a price and what Brugge were asking was above the price.