With respect, how does a comment on a comment made by our manager in relation to transfers, have nothing to do with transfers?
Just because it strikes a nerve with you doesn’t make it not relevant.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Just because it strikes a nerve with you doesn’t make it not relevant.
I wouldn't, not sure the game is lending itself to strikers anymore, the position will more or less be in vogue in a couple of years so if no one is using out and out strikers you have less chance of making it.
Daniel is only responsible for the good ones.You've been telling us for months Daniel Levy has absolutely nothing to do with transfers.....
Then you post this
Because it's a thinly veiled dig that's a great reach from the manager's original comments. Just because it attacks the club doesn't make it relevant.
You've been telling us for months Daniel Levy has absolutely nothing to do with transfers.....
Then you post this
You've been telling us for months/years that the stick Levy gets has nothing to do with him being Jewish yet in our discussion the other day the general consensus was that part of the reason why was because of his heritage.
You haven't taken it back yet and when I called you out out on it you did your usual disappearing act on this forum, it's as almost if we'd won a match...
I'd pipe down if I were you, there's a good lad.
At a quarter of the fees mentioned possibly. But not at £20m.
A player who wouldn’t have a position today.
Can you imagine trying to negotiate with his fruit loop mother?!
No idea how true that is but I’m struggling to believe he is as injured as he is to miss the whole tour.
That’s interesting. In these times of the lesser spotted number 9 I’d have thought a Barmby would be in vogue right now
Lord … I’m not saying he was the answer but in hindsight almost anything other than those 2 wasters
If true that would explain why we have been so quiet because Richy leaving changes the plans.
Lucky he didn’t or Archie would be a brentford player
Seems to be versatile, pacy forwards that can play anywhere across the front three as opposed to a big target man with little ability to run in behind.
Daniel is only responsible for the good ones.
This isn't untrue. Not for Levy and not for managers either.
People will beat on Conte for wanting Richarlison (without knowing if he was a Conte signing) but not even acknowledge Porro was (probably) a Conte signing.
People use it when it suits their agenda.
The only time I think it's safe to say a player is not a managers signing is when the manager refuses to play them and ends up sacked.
Mourinho - Bale.
Conte - Spence.
So when he personally came out and said he was staying in England. This is what he really meant ?