he is average at most things at Prem level but has incredible stamina.Come on he is not average or slightly above.
AM want him enough to pay 40m for him
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
he is average at most things at Prem level but has incredible stamina.Come on he is not average or slightly above.
AM want him enough to pay 40m for him
We don’t know what they are paying for Gallagher yet - or how it’s structuredYet wouldn't even pay half of what they're paying for Gallagher.
I'd love to be proven wrong, I'm not saying he's technically deficient, just no more than tidy.Then you aren’t looking at the same things I’m looking at.
Just because he’s an elite athlete doesn’t mean he’s not technical. Usually being an elite athlete leans people towards not seeing the technical side of a players game.
Well, if that is the case, then whoever at the football club thought that Richarlison was an adequate replacement for Harry Kane, should be sacked on the spot and never be allowed to work in football again.I can't believe I still read, almost daily, that we haven't signed Kanes replacement.
It was always Richarlison.
Whether he ever was or is able to fill that hole is irrelevant, we blatantly signed him before we sold Kane knowing full well Kane was gonna be sold and everyone would bump their prices after we sold him.
We're not looking to replace Kane anymore.
We might be looking to replace Richarlison though.
If we got Gallagher, Eze, a new full back and another attacker in then surely we’d all be fairly placated?
A lot to do though and I would be massively surprised if we did.
Well, if that is the case, then whoever at the football club thought that Richarlison was an adequate replacement for Harry Kane, should be sacked on the spot and never be allowed to work in football again.
I 100% agree with you. It’s not that we I don’t think he’s good or an asset for us but he’s not a technically very good player.I'd love to be proven wrong, I'm not saying he's technically deficient, just no more than tidy.
I think he's a good player, just don't see the same things that people are raving about. I think in a midfield with the right mix around him he can be a great asset, but for me he's never going to be this midfield maestro that some are expecting.
I'll happily wager a gentleman's bet that he doesn't reach 10 g/a this season.
I'd pay money to see it.Steve McClaren: Jamaica name former England boss as head coach
How long do we think it'll be until Steve opens news conferences with "Wagwan" and develops a strong jamaican accent?![]()
Who do you suggest they buy. Nobody around the same as Kane. Richy hasn’t worked because of injury. 10 goals in 20 games last season. No doubt they would sell him if anywhere near 60m.Well, if that is the case, then whoever at the football club thought that Richarlison was an adequate replacement for Harry Kane, should be sacked on the spot and never be allowed to work in football again.
Yes find it boring if you want but if your happy with some of those forwards and the likes of Gallagher to take us to next level and close the gap good luck. We need quality simple as that!
I'll happily wager a gentleman's bet that he doesn't reach 10 g/a this season.
Play Kulu in between the sticks?Sorry, did you see him against Fulham in the League Cup last season? Horrendous.
A back up keeper is badly badly needed but unfortunately as a result of horrible squad management and our snails pace approach to transfers, it’s highly unlikely to be position we get to in this window.
As others have alluded to, we need to cross absolutely everything that nothing happens to Vicario.
He basically carried their team. Palmer got all the goals but without Gallagher they were proper fucked. I hope he leaves them regardless as they’ll be worse off without him.
Yes find it boring if you want but if your happy with some of those forwards and the likes of Gallagher to take us to next level and close the gap good luck. We need quality simple as that!
It's rather silly, though. He gets injured, there's no way he's being sold.I don't think that matters too much tbh.
When we were close to signing van de Ven, he played in friendlies for Wolfsburg a day or two before being seen at the Shakhtar game...
Kane played 3 or so days before signing for Bayern etc.
Change the fucking boring record. Another one on ignore.We all know we won't get any of those. Building hotels doesn't pay for itself you know...
I'm talking about Sarr for us.I don't think Atletico care much about goals and assists from their CM - they like players who can run around a lot and be shithouses.
I'd love to be proven wrong, I'm not saying he's technically deficient, just no more than tidy.
I think he's a good player, just don't see the same things that people are raving about. I think in a midfield with the right mix around him he can be a great asset, but for me he's never going to be this midfield maestro that some are expecting.
I'll happily wager a gentleman's bet that he doesn't reach 10 g/a this season.