• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

How Dry should our Powder be?


  • Total voters
    57
The concern with Solanke isn't that he's not shiny; he's averaged one goal every 303 minutes in his PL career. Had one good goalscoring season in PL last season, and even then he scored less than his xG.
Granted, but when you have people shouting "just pay the money for Gyokeres," when he hasn't played a single match in the PL, then you've got to question that motivation. He's outscored his xG in the Portuguese league. That alone should put a question mark over his potential suitability, but because it's an £80M pricetag, he's suddenly elevated to elite class.

You can apply the same logic to Alvarez, who's played in a much better team, that create far more chances for their front men, who has also underperformed his xG (more than Solanke), yet we've had the "just pay the extra £20M for Alvarez" posts on here over the last day or so.

The only real conclusion you can arrive at, when you look at those 3 players, is that it is the pricetag that is getting the "shiny cadre" all moist.

So we're clear, I have no real dog in this fight. All of them have "concerns," but to dismiss one because he's had one good season, then elevate the other 2 when one has never played in the PL, and the other has been hugely underwhelming, is ridiculous.
 
It reminds me a little bit of when we signed Darren bent.

Decent player, will likely improve our team, but isn't going to take us to the top and you would never see someone like City buying a darren bent or solanke.

Darren Bent was and still is a total melt. Redknapp never fancied him tbh and he seemed to be more of a signing the club pushed for. Solanke has a profile that fully fits what the manager is publicly asking for and the scouting seems to be more specific. We saw from Solanke last season that he will put himself about against anyone as well. He's much more assertive and aggressive than Darren Bent ever was.
 
Darren Bent was and still is a total melt. Redknapp never fancied him tbh and he seemed to be more of a signing the club pushed for. Solanke has a profile that fully fits what the manager is publicly asking for and the scouting seems to be more specific. We saw from Solanke last season that he will put himself about against anyone as well. He's much more assertive and aggressive than Darren Bent ever was.
He’s a far better natural footballer too. I’m not sure people realise what Solanke is. The goals are catching up to his ability.
 
I'm sure earlier in the window Bournemouth were linked with a loan for Veliz. Got to now wonder if that got out as it came up in discussions with them for Solanke? This is from April

 
Starting to believe "ambition" simply means sign players from big clubs tbh.
You've been blabbering on about 'ambition' all fucking morning like a man possessed.

Maybe you could answer you're own question for us.

If we are ambitious, why are we the only Big 6 club in England that never, Ever wins anything. What are we doing wrong that other clubs of comparable wealth are doing right?

Something don't stack up, pal.
 
He also said this

"At Celtic, I had Kyogo, who was a sort of out and out number nine and in Japan, l've always had a striker. It just depends, like last year we had to be a bit creative, it's to fair say. You know but if Harry would have stayed I definitely would have used him!" he
said. "So I think for us what's more important is the type of striker we get. You know we play a certain way. We demand certain things from a physical perspective from the technical aspects of it that it's going be a
striker that fits that mould. "It's still the area of the park we're really probably the thinnest when I talk about squad-wise at the moment, so obviously
that's a focus for us."

Not exactly a ringing endorsement for Richarlison. A striker is clearly his priority. I think he will end up disappointed.
Seems like Ange should bring in Kyogo from Celtic. He's an out and out number 9 that knows Ange's style of play.
 
Back
Top