• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Match Galatasaray VS Tottenham Hotspur. Thursday 7th November @17:45. UEFA Europa League.

  • Thread starter Thread starter FOK
  • Start date Start date

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

With Romero, Richarlison, Odobert and Van de Ven likely to be out injured, there might be FOUR youngsters on the 12 man bench allowed :

Easier to show that by putting up a possible squad to show the space on the bench:

Vicario
Porro, Dragusin, Davies, Gray
Bissouma, Maddison, Bergvall
Moore, Lankshear, Son

subs : Forster, Udogie, Sarr, Bentancur, Kulusevski, Werner, Johnson, Solanke, (8) ....... so room for maybe Dorrington (CB), Olusesi (CM), Austin (GK) plus another
 
Perhaps Galatians?



Gaul?
Yes. This could be it. Very nice of you to post Wikipedia links too.

Galatasaray might very well have been a fortress or stronghold of Galatians that Turks conquered and incorporated as part of their domain. So that they've given their own word saray to the old Galatian stronghold and thereby making it their own. That is very much the history of the whole modern world. Big and hugely numerous national groups, backed by religion, conquering and incorporating others. And Turks in particular were famous for that in that part of the world. They've done that same thing to many, many other cities and fortresses so that this should not strike anyone as a big surprise.

Turks were in fact most successful under their Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent who ventured as far as Vienna to the west but stopped, failed short of it. Hurrem Sultan was his wife and she was known as the one pulling all of the strings when it came to domestic affairs that she happened to find herself concerned with. And, indeed, the domestic matters that happened to come under the purview of her concern grew a whole, whole lot during her reign. She was the force to be reckoned with behind Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Here is a photo from your link:



Notice how the main hypothesis there appears to be that the name Galata comes from "Gauls," the old Celtic tribe. But notice also how your wikipedia link doesn't even try to explain why was that tribe named Gauls. In other words, why was that old Celtic tribe named by the word gauls?

Also notice a couple of other things:

1. How Istanbul, where Galata-saray is and where Gauls had their stronghold, is very much located on the sea. It is a tremendous place as a sea location. Connected to the Black Sea and connected to the Mediterranean Sea via the Dardanelles Strait.
2. How other hypotheses about the origin of the word Galata are also associated with the sea - as per that Italian word calata in the photo above.

Hence, I think that the word Galata indeed comes from Gauls, the old Celtic tribe. But that the tribe itself was named after gulls. The birds colloquially known as seagulls. And Gauls were so named because they lived and liked to live next to and off of the sea. Just like the birds.

 
Yes. This could be it. Very nice of you to post Wikipedia links too.

Galatasaray might very well have been a fortress or stronghold of Galatians that Turks conquered and incorporated as part of their domain. So that they've given their own word saray to the old Galatian stronghold and thereby making it their own. That is very much the history of the whole modern world. Big and hugely numerous national groups, backed by religion, conquering and incorporating others. And Turks in particular were famous for that in that part of the world. They've done that same thing to many, many other cities and fortresses so that this should not strike anyone as a big surprise.

Turks were in fact most successful under their Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent who ventured as far as Vienna to the west but stopped, failed short of it. Hurrem Sultan was his wife and she was known as the one pulling all of the strings when it came to domestic affairs that she happened to concern herself with.
As I wrote before, Galatas is a Byzantine name, not a Turkish one. The Turkish name for the area is Karakoy.
 
Built by Sultan Beyazıd II in 1481, the name of the area where the Galatasaray school is located is galata, which comes from the word gallada, meaning the road to the sea in the language of the Genoese who lived in the region before, and the word palace means the school belonging to the palace. The palace here does not directly mean a castle, but a mansion, a place where the sultan and the government stayed.
An interesting username, should have prefaced it with DNS!!

👀 😂
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Here is a photo from your link:



Notice how the main hypothesis there appears to be that the name Galata comes from "Gauls," the old Celtic tribe. But notice also how your wikipedia link doesn't even try to explain why was that tribe named Gauls. In other words, why was that old Celtic tribe named by the word gauls?

Also notice a couple of other things:

1. How Istanbul, where Galata-saray is and where Gauls had their stronghold, is very much located on the sea. It is a tremendous place as a sea location. Connected to the Black Sea and connected to the Mediterranean Sea via the Dardanelles Strait.
2. How other hypotheses about the origin of the word Galata are also associated with the sea - as per that Italian word calata in the photo above.

Hence, I think that the word Galata indeed comes from Gauls, the old Celtic tribe. But that the tribe itself was named after gulls. The birds colloquially known as seagulls. And Gauls were so named because they lived and liked to live next to and off of the sea. Just like the birds.

To be honest, what set me off was the book in the bible, “Galatians”, and knowledge that early churches were in Asia Minor (Cappadocia), now Turkey and also Greece (Turkey being, “Greek” before the Islamic conquests).
 
Maybe Deki as the false 9 for the first 60 minutes. Otherwise I think that looks good.
I don’t think we should start all four teenagers tbh. And I’m a big advocate for giving young uns a good chance in competitive games, think this is a step too far due to crowd, and experience of opposition. Maybe we say f it and be bold and don’t worry about the potential loss and they can bank an intimidating experience on their journeys
 
It will not just be during the match. Do not be surprised to hear that the team were kept awake the night before by fireworks outside their hotel or attacks on their coach getting to the ground. This is just the sort of place a Homer ref will allow all sorts of thuggery on the pitch and they will target the younger players. Bergvall has not been the same expansive player since Vic shouted at him, do not be surprised if they hide and other players have no one to pass to. They may have to come on as subs but that is not as bad as starting.
There are enough other matches for the kids to play and we need experienced players for this match. It is not as if we are playing Woolwich next but Ipswich and at home. Resting did not help us against Palace and Brighton.
We have an International break next but after that it will be relentless 2 matches a week for some time.
Spurs fans call for depth so we can rest and rotate yet don't want us to use said depth when the perfect opportunity arises 🤦‍♂️
Pffft... It'll be character building!!!

We've just had 4/5 nights solid of Fireworks in and around London already this week
... What's a few more gonna do?
 
Think I'd work backwards and first look at who I wanted to leave at home for a bit of R&R, Kulu, Son, Pape, Solanke, Johnson, Udogie, Porro and pick my squad/team from who's left and available.
 
Back
Top