I'd rather Terzic than Bosz. But
Incomplete_usernam
is quite correct. The strangest of the many canards that surround Ange Postecoglou is the notion that to replace him signifies we have entered some coaching waste land never to return. Jack Pitt-Brooke was punting this nonsense 'I don't know what they do if they fire Ange".
I know, you replace him with a coach who- though committed to attacking progressive football -understands that control comes from a disciplined well drilled back four goalkeeper and sitting midfield player that retains it shape out of possession. That isn't wedded to only one way of playing and that understands game state and can adjust its ethos to reflect this.
The cultist want to hide behind Levy and or injuries because it deflects from our head coaches inability to do the very rudimentary things. I won't belittle Ange's character because having met him I think he is a good man, he certainly wasn't the taciturn passive aggressive character I've seen in interview. He's funny warm kind and engaging I personally wish him well.
However I was one of the earliest to publicly questioned his coaching. I simply think he's been over promoted. I watched the team even in games we were winning and the systemic faillings became very obvious no matter how much I wished it was diffrent. Worse he fixed almost none of it. After 58 games it hurts to say he is the least capable coach I've seen in our dugout. The Ossie Ardiles parallels are striking.