• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers January Transfer Thread 24/25

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

We don't have a midtable attack, though.

Liverpool are the only club that have scored more goals. We're on track for 80 goals scored in the league.

We've only scored 80 goals in the league twice in 60 years.

People are completely misguided in what the problem with this squad is. The defence is rubbish. Undisciplined, uncoordinated, chaos created by a manager who has no actual idea of how to defend...just go score, score, score.

He's a buffoon.
Our attackers would look even worse without such a gung ho manager. I dread to imagine what that would look like.
 
Well Ange to Mourinho is night and day. One thinks you have to score 5 goals to win a match, the other thinks 1 is good enough.

We conceded 63 goals the season before Ange arrived, 61 last season, and 60 this season.

It definitely has to do with how we play, but it's got much more to do with our weak midfield (the common link between pre-Ange and Ange) than it does our attack.

Posted this yesterday in the "who replaces Ange" thread:


Our line isn't even as high as people assume it is. But we've very slow to recover. This is because there's basically zero organization to our defence behind our attack. Our midfield is all pushed up, and seemingly with no communication. When Porro or Spence go forward, no one is covering them.

Yes Johnson needs to do a better job tracking back. But when your wing forward isn't tracking back into the defensive 1/3rd, it's less of an individual error/effort issue than a tactical issue. Any system that requires that much defending from your attackers is just completely broken.

Ange has created a system that literally anyone with eyes can tell requires a very talented DM. And he's deployed this despite not having a DM in the squad and without making any visible effort to get a DM.

TL;DR: The issue isn't the attack. It's the imbalanced midfield and the lack of cohesive strategy and communication in the back line.

Well yes of course we do need a better more consistent DM but that is hard to get. You only have to look at the huge issues City have had since Rodri got injured to see the effects of that position. Attack as the form of defence isn’t new though, Liverpool under Klopp with Mane, Ferminho and Salah and with Henderson and Fabinho in behind perfected it, your not going to get any of that with an ageing Son and Johnson, they can’t do it and Bissouma isn’t the tactically smart guy to run the 6. I won’t deny it does require very high level players and players with the right blend of skills but as a club we should be able to acquire those players. Even if Ange goes I doubt we will be moving away from this high press hard attack style of football so at some point we have to get the players to make it work. Ange isn’t even playing that different from Klopp, main difference is the full backs invert and the wingers stay wide where as with Klopp it was the opposite But other than that the principles are basically the same and our next manager will probably be some variant on that so one way or another we have to get used to it generally speaking.
 
The lad can play but I don’t want him. Although he walks into our first team.

He’s a bringer of chaos and sometimes that is really good…. He looks like he’s going to mess something up and then before you know it he’s beaten 3 players and made 40 yards….he can finish when he’s in the mood… he’s quick and skilful…some days he’s world class.

Other days he’s just a shit Dembele.

And I never feel in the big games that he’s going to make a difference.

Maybe I can’t get over the pain of that save by Martinez.
Ah shit, no good for our relegation battle then?

:ange-facepalm:
 
Well yes of course we do need a better more consistent DM but that is hard to get. You only have to look at the huge issues City have had since Rodri got injured to see the effects of that position. Attack as the form of defence isn’t new though, Liverpool under Klopp with Mane, Ferminho and Salah and with Henderson and Fabinho in behind perfected it, your not going to get any of that with an ageing Son and Johnson, they can’t do it and Bissouma isn’t the tactically smart guy to run the 6. I won’t deny it does require very high level players and players with the right blend of skills but as a club we should be able to acquire those players. Even if Ange goes I doubt we will be moving away from this high press hard attack style of football so at some point we have to get the players to make it work. Ange isn’t even playing that different from Klopp, main difference is the full backs invert and the wingers stay wide where as with Klopp it was the opposite But other than that the principles are basically the same and our next manager will probably be some variant on that so one way or another we have to get used to it generally speaking.
I'm just over it, honestly. It's always the attackers fault, we're always another 1 or 2 £80M+ attackers away from putting it together. This is really just because supporters like shiny new toys and nothing is as exciting as expensive forwards.

If our attackers were better, we'd still be shit. When you concede 60+ goals, the 1st group questioned should be the defender - not conceding goals is their primary objective. The 2nd group in question should be the midfielders - not conceding goals is 1/2 of their brief.

The last group in question should be the attackers. 100%, defending from the front is a valid concept. But the idea is that if you defend from the front, 30% of opposing attacks are killed in the cradle - that leaves fewer attacks for the midfield and defence to contend with. The idea isn't that your attackers should be so good at pressing your midfield and defenders can completely neglect their defensive responsibilities - which is what is happening.

Why is our entire back line out with lower body injuries? Because they're consistently and habitually scrambling to try and cover complete lapses of defensive organization and communication.

I'd be happy to have better forwards than what's left of Son and Johnson. But we could spend £200M on forwards and we're not going to win a thing without fixing the tactics and improving the midfield.
 
I'm just over it, honestly. It's always the attackers fault, we're always another 1 or 2 £80M+ attackers away from putting it together. This is really just because supporters like shiny new toys and nothing is as exciting as expensive forwards.

If our attackers were better, we'd still be shit. When you concede 60+ goals, the 1st group questioned should be the defender - not conceding goals is their primary objective. The 2nd group in question should be the midfielders - not conceding goals is 1/2 of their brief.

The last group in question should be the attackers. 100%, defending from the front is a valid concept. But the idea is that if you defend from the front, 30% of opposing attacks are killed in the cradle - that leaves fewer attacks for the midfield and defence to contend with. The idea isn't that your attackers should be so good at pressing your midfield and defenders can completely neglect their defensive responsibilities - which is what is happening.

Why is our entire back line out with lower body injuries? Because they're consistently and habitually scrambling to try and cover complete lapses of defensive organization and communication.

I'd be happy to have better forwards than what's left of Son and Johnson. But we could spend £200M on forwards and we're not going to win a thing without fixing the tactics and improving the midfield.
Agree- our play style is crazy, and likely leads to more sprints without the ball per player per 90 than any other team. I wonder what the numbers would look like.

The thing is, you want your defense and midfielders to do something- having the front three press all the time and then also be expected to lead dynamic attacks is a recipe for surefire exhaustion. You need all players to contribute towards running and pressing.

The whole game under Ange seems sped up and compacted beyond what is comfortable. We have attacker exhausting themselves running all the time and defenders constantly making goal-saving sprints. These peak fitness moments and lack of rotation have to be having a negative effect on player fitness- we can't seriously be expecting them to outperform the league average in km run on a regular basis, can we?
 
Agree- our play style is crazy, and likely leads to more sprints without the ball per player per 90 than any other team. I wonder what the numbers would look like.

The thing is, you want your defense and midfielders to do something- having the front three press all the time and then also be expected to lead dynamic attacks is a recipe for surefire exhaustion. You need all players to contribute towards running and pressing.

The whole game under Ange seems sped up and compacted beyond what is comfortable. We have attacker exhausting themselves running all the time and defenders constantly making goal-saving sprints. These peak fitness moments and lack of rotation have to be having a negative effect on player fitness- we can't seriously be expecting them to outperform the league average in km run on a regular basis, can we?

From October but shows were top of the sprint race followed closely by Liverpool.
 
Agree- our play style is crazy, and likely leads to more sprints without the ball per player per 90 than any other team. I wonder what the numbers would look like.

The thing is, you want your defense and midfielders to do something- having the front three press all the time and then also be expected to lead dynamic attacks is a recipe for surefire exhaustion. You need all players to contribute towards running and pressing.

The whole game under Ange seems sped up and compacted beyond what is comfortable. We have attacker exhausting themselves running all the time and defenders constantly making goal-saving sprints. These peak fitness moments and lack of rotation have to be having a negative effect on player fitness- we can't seriously be expecting them to outperform the league average in km run on a regular basis, can we?
Agree. The Cartilage Captain article I recently posted points out that with Poch, Klopp, etc. there are designated triggers to pressing.

Such as when the ball is played to the FB near the touchline - obviously having the boundary to use as an extra defender greatly advantages the pressing team.

But with Ange, it just seems to be whenever we're out of possession - press, press, press. The calamity of this systemless philosophy is accerbated by the fact there's seemingly similarly no tactics on which defenders push into attack and who then drops back to cover, it's just push, push, push. So when we turn the ball over, there's no shape to recover into and the only instruction is press, press, press. Eventually the opposition picks a good pass in this situation and that's all it takes.

The naive tactics can work when you have a squad twice as good, twice as deep (and four times as expensive) like at Celtic. And it can work in leagues like Australia and Japan (and maybe the MLS) where the tactical and technical ability is so low, you can just out physical ability your opponents. But they cannot work in a league such as the PL.

You cannot be physically superior enough to your opponents - everyone in the PL is a pretty damned good, well trained athlete. And your opponents are too smart and well prepared by some of the best managers and coaches in the sport to let the obvious holes in your play to go unseen.

Occasionally enough will go right fast enough that you'll swarm a team, like the City result. But more often than not opponents will just let you wear yourself out and play searching balls into your gaps, and strike when opportunity presents itself.
 
Vicario
Porro - Romero - VDV - LB
Bergvall - Bissouma - Madison
RW - Solanke - LW

Above is how we should be our first x11 next year, in my opinion. Think bergvall is going to make the 8 his spot with Gray rotating there.

Since this season is shot, we should be looking toward next season instead of optimizing for injuries right now. We need atleast 2 new wingers, brining in RKM on a loan/buy, makes sense and we can see if we want him. Think we need to find a new LB this January too
 
Vicario
Porro - Romero - VDV - LB
Bergvall - Bissouma - Madison
RW - Solanke - LW

Above is how we should be our first x11 next year, in my opinion. Think bergvall is going to make the 8 his spot with Gray rotating there.

Since this season is shot, we should be looking toward next season instead of optimizing for injuries right now. We need atleast 2 new wingers, brining in RKM on a loan/buy, makes sense and we can see if we want him. Think we need to find a new LB this January too
No. We need a proper DM more than we need wingers.
 
Back
Top