In your view, is there no middle ground between Ange-ball on one side and Cont/Mouringo-ball in the other?In general, some of the most prominent arguments are
'I can't see Angeball ever working'
'He's too stubborn'
Etc
That assumes that other managers would have gotten more points by sitting back, being more 'pragmatic', etc.
This will never be proven.
All I know is pragmatic football didn't work for us with Jose or Conte and playing that way lost the players and fans far quicker than Angeball has.
Sacking Ange is not a surefire way to more points. Can easily make the same argument that such a shakeup would damage us more.
Just have to see what the chiefs end up thinking I guess.
I think it's possible to play attacking football, with coordinated high press and when you need to defend you are organised in defence.
Ange can attack. The bad thing is, that he hasn't in 18 months been able to teach the players how to coordinate the high press end how to play organised in defense. That's on Ange. Of course, it would look a little better if our best defenders and Vicario were available but the structure would still be missing
He must go. Now rather then later. There is still time to save some face this season and probably fight for a win in the Europa League. If we keep Ange, we don't stand a chance against well organised teams that can counter.
