• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
Or maybe they don’t do enough? Many modern players look a bit weedy these days. I remember when football players usually had solid quads on them. Now they all look a bit skinny and more like endurance runners. You need a little bit of muscle on your legs to help prevent injury. Some of them now look like a strong gust of wind would knock them over.

Dave Mackay would have snapped most of this squad in half with one of his tackles.

Who knows

Football wasn’t really played at the intensity it is now either
 
Or maybe they don’t do enough? Many modern players look a bit weedy these days. I remember when football players usually had solid quads on them. Now they all look a bit skinny and more like endurance runners. You need a little bit of muscle on your legs to help prevent injury. Some of them now look like a strong gust of wind would knock them over.

Dave Mackay would have snapped most of this squad in half with one of his tackles.
It's a balance. Too much muscle and you use up too much energy feeding them. Those sorts of players are never gonna run 10k a match and be at a high level by the end of the match. You can't overcome biology without chemical cheating.
Too little muscle and you get battered. Unless you're a Modric type who was a freak really.

Like it not though, football is more a running semi-contact sport than a full on contact sport. Being overly big and strong for most positions isn't useful.
Most players are 5ft 9 to 6ft 3 these days. You don't see too many short players or freakishly large players. They're a true 5ft 9 as well. When Dave from the office, who says he's 5ft 10 to the birds stands next to them, he'd look small. Cause he is.
 
It seems to play a part in the injuries.

How much squad depth do we need. It’s starting to look like we’d need to spend city money to make it work.

If we were 10th, I could understand. But 15th is inexcusable.

City money....

Screenshot-2025-01-21-at-14-30-31.png
 
Was ETH a brilliant manager for ManU ?
Would you have kept him in charge if it was your decision to make?
Haha! The main reason I wanted United to win the final? There was just a chance that Lord Rat and Co would lose their nerve and keep him on. Ignoring - Coverntry, Palace, Brighton Brentofrd and God knows how many APPALLING performances the team put in. They manged to avoid losing to LFC 3 times, but really the 2 I saw LFC shouldve knocked em for 6. In the FA Cup tie they had as many chances as they did v us in the 3-6, couldve had 10.

And they did!! The ONE performance - albeit a bit lucky with a gifted goal and a number of scrapes at 2-1!! The ONE performnce,m final game of the season.

"Yep, he's the one for us!"

In the unlikely event we win cup, it wouldnt change my view - he's got to go. Just not good enough.

If we won 2 cups, again, he's got to go.

UNLESS - BIG IF: he completely revamps his approach and we can keep clean sheets. but 3 all season? Just don't see it.
 
But wait.
You have multiple times here very strongly praised our relentless pressing and how we win the ball back close to opposition goal.

And one would imagine that constant intense pressing high in opposition half takes a very intense effort.
Also this is statistically and factually proven - whenever we are leading game in EPL, we take the least time to put the ball back into play.
Here is link of that - Which Premier League Teams Time-Waste the Most? | Opta Analyst ; so we put ball 8 seconds faster into the play then for example Aston Villa. If there are say 12 stoppages. It amounts to 96 seconds of extra recovery time. In a level where every 0,00..% counts.
Which gives less recovery time. Which in term means more intense input from our players.

And then, when you have logics explained, let's double check the outcomes of it.
Like for example the extent of injury crises in ongoing season. And season before. Last season was worst I've ever seen for us. This season tops it by a mile.
So two worst injury-hit seasons back-to-back. Under both manager is Ange.

So you have logics explained. And you can see actual, factual and real life examples.
But you rather go with "oh it is amusing, Ange has nothing to do with it because I think so". Nice. Really well argumented point!


1. Yes, he is playing an extra intense style with less timewasting.
2. Yes that does place extra demand on the players.
3. That’s what he was recruited to do.

So,

If the club has cut the wage bill by 35m in one summer and replaced senior players with 18 year olds who can’t be thrown straight in to start the season. Is that still Ange’s fault if players start picking up injuries?

Also,

He has actually adjusted the press to be less intense as the injuries hit. That’s not me saying that, it’s been noted and shows out in our pressing stats.

And,

Vicario - not intensity related

Romero - was an ankle knock from a challenge then had a completely different injury after 3 weeks break. Ange even held back his return.

Richarlison - injury prone since he arrived at the club. Nobody in their right mind can blame Ange for those.

So really you could try and blame Ange for Hamstrings and of those, Odobert had hardly even played when he got injured and VDV definitely wasn’t being overplayed. Davies and Udogie happened as a direct result of the compound effect of other injuries and for Udogie Spence getting a ridiculous second yellow for a blatant dive.
 
Why is that, where are they going?

They can't just suddenly up and leave when they feel like it? :D

You and I both know that if there’s an opportunity to make money Levy more often than not takes it, Berba, Modric… if players feel they’re can play at a higher level then they make a fuss until they get let go. I get they have contracts, but it’s something we’ve seen time and time again.

Player gets annoyed, wants to move, kicks up a fuss, eventually they let him go so it doesn’t affect the rest of the team.

I did say, I’m not saying all of them will go, however I think it’s naive to just assume we start next season with the same set of players if we keep letting Ange take us lower.
 
Actually I would.

I saw ManU vs Newcastle.
Amorim fucked up with selection. Conceded 2 goals.
Acted right away, took off Zirkzee and put on Mainoo and it had impact.

From there on they were very much in game and LOT less open in defense.

I know perfectly well that Ange would have just stood there with grim grimace and would have seen us concede 4-6 goals with first half.

Also ... well... since appointment he has taken ManU above us in the table...
Also he is in starting phase, trying to instill his way into players. Not having had 60 games where results keep getting worse.
Also he is 39 so very much still learning and developing. Not 59 and close to retirement.

So in short - yes.

There’s a lot of people comparing Ange to Amorim. It doesn’t make any sense.

Ange has had three transfer windows, a number of these players are ‘his’. He’s had a season and a half to get ideas across, and for players to adapt to his “system”.

Amorim, hasn’t finished his full transfer window yet and I think United are buggered with PSR until they sell first, he doesn’t therefore have any players he has wanted for his system, he’s got an old, creaking poorly put together squad.

They aren’t at the same stage in their journey here, Ange has had more time and backing and shouldn’t be sat under Amorim in the table.
 
You and I both know that if there’s an opportunity to make money Levy more often than not takes it, Berba, Modric… if players feel they’re can play at a higher level then they make a fuss until they get let go. I get they have contracts, but it’s something we’ve seen time and time again.

Player gets annoyed, wants to move, kicks up a fuss, eventually they let him go so it doesn’t affect the rest of the team.

I did say, I’m not saying all of them will go, however I think it’s naive to just assume we start next season with the same set of players if we keep letting Ange take us lower.

Levy actually is very reluctant to sell his best players and is more likely to ask for big money for them, he has a history of that and will only sell when their contracts are running down and they haven's signed.

The thing with this argument is if you reverse it, if our players are doing well and have the club challenging do you not think these players would not be attractive to potential suitors? Do you think the likes of Romero and Porro would turn down potential offers from Real just because we happen to be doing well.

Either way our better players will want to go to a bigger club at some point, more so if they are playing well when their stocks are high,
 
There’s a lot of people comparing Ange to Amorim. It doesn’t make any sense.

Ange has had three transfer windows, a number of these players are ‘his’. He’s had a season and a half to get ideas across, and for players to adapt to his “system”.

Amorim, hasn’t finished his full transfer window yet and I think United are buggered with PSR until they sell first, he doesn’t therefore have any players he has wanted for his system, he’s got an old, creaking poorly put together squad.

They aren’t at the same stage in their journey here, Ange has had more time and backing and shouldn’t be sat under Amorim in the table.
Ange is 59
Amorim is 39

One of them has scope to improve.
 
Actually I would.

I saw ManU vs Newcastle.
Amorim fucked up with selection. Conceded 2 goals.
Acted right away, took off Zirkzee and put on Mainoo and it had impact.

From there on they were very much in game and LOT less open in defense.

I know perfectly well that Ange would have just stood there with grim grimace and would have seen us concede 4-6 goals with first half.

Also ... well... since appointment he has taken ManU above us in the table...
Also he is in starting phase, trying to instill his way into players. Not having had 60 games where results keep getting worse.
Also he is 39 so very much still learning and developing. Not 59 and close to retirement.

So in short - yes.

Plus our squad suits him.
 
Levy actually is very reluctant to sell his best players and is more likely to ask for big money for them, he has a history of that and will only sell when their contracts are running down and they haven's signed.

The thing with this argument is if you reverse it, if our players are doing well and have the club challenging do you not think these players would not be attractive to potential suitors? Do you think the likes of Romero and Porro would turn down potential offers from Real just because we happen to be doing well.

Either way our better players will want to go to a bigger club at some point, more so if they are playing well when their stocks are high,

Is that entirely true though? And that’s a bit rhetorical if I’m honest because tbh I can see how it can be framed either way.

You’re right, they could essentially leave at either point. However if they are playing in a team doing well, winning games and achieving something to me, they’re happier, it’s harder to get them to move on because they’re happy. Of course if Madrid come in for you then sure, you likely move either way. A lot of players want to play in the champions league, if we are doing that then they’re only really going to leave to go somewhere they have more chance of winning those competitions instead of just competing in them.

If we finish low, have no Europe etc, there’s a whole host of clubs and a wider market for them. Plus, being here, playing in a crap system going no where they’re less likely to be happy and more likely to move (in my opinion).
 
There’s a lot of people comparing Ange to Amorim. It doesn’t make any sense.

Ange has had three transfer windows, a number of these players are ‘his’. He’s had a season and a half to get ideas across, and for players to adapt to his “system”.

Amorim, hasn’t finished his full transfer window yet and I think United are buggered with PSR until they sell first, he doesn’t therefore have any players he has wanted for his system, he’s got an old, creaking poorly put together squad.

They aren’t at the same stage in their journey here, Ange has had more time and backing and shouldn’t be sat under Amorim in the table.

You're correct to dismiss Ange at this stage but putting stocks in Amorim after the way he's managed Utd so far is laughable, he may come good but the record he has at the moment is embarrassing and the Utd fans will tell you it's not just down to the players, he's made a fuck load of mistakes, from selections, to subs.
 
You're correct to dismiss Ange at this stage but putting stocks in Amorim after the way he's managed Utd so far is laughable, he may come good but the record he has at the moment is embarrassing and the Utd fans will tell you it's not just down to the players, he's made a fuck load of mistakes, from selections, to subs.

I’m not putting stocks in him, I’ve openly said that before we got Ange my choice was Amorim. I haven’t said he’s managed United well and perhaps I’m wrong about him. Of course he’s made mistakes getting to know his squad and its issues. It may well all still fall flat on its face for him.

My point, is that you can’t compare the two, they are in very different situations for the reasons I mentioned. Ange has had a season and a half, so he should be a season and a half ahead of Amorim in terms of progress, he isn’t.

He’s two points and two positions behind him despite a head start.
 
Is that entirely true though? And that’s a bit rhetorical if I’m honest because tbh I can see how it can be framed either way.

You’re right, they could essentially leave at either point. However if they are playing in a team doing well, winning games and achieving something to me, they’re happier, it’s harder to get them to move on because they’re happy. Of course if Madrid come in for you then sure, you likely move either way. A lot of players want to play in the champions league, if we are doing that then they’re only really going to leave to go somewhere they have more chance of winning those competitions instead of just competing in them.

If we finish low, have no Europe etc, there’s a whole host of clubs and a wider market for them. Plus, being here, playing in a crap system going no where they’re less likely to be happy and more likely to move (in my opinion).

Bit in bold, is this about my point about Levy?

Either way happier than not my point is that it's just as unlikely/likely for them to leave when the club is doing badly as opposed to them club doing well, actually more chance of them being picked off because they'd be getting noticed more.

The only player right now in danger of leaving is Romero but we know that already and even then it's not even crystal clear that he is Real's no1 target anyway...the others? Well are they even playing well enough to go anywhere which they would consider an upgrade? I don't think so.
 
Back
Top