More sprints doesn't = more physical load.
That chart seemed to reference Footovision as a data source but no information on how they actually define what a sprint is and how they collect their data on sprints. I checked their website and it seems they use AI screen capture. No issue with that but even then, what kind of sprints are the issue they are claiming cause injuries? Is a long sprint more load on a player than 2-3 short accelerations? do they count short accelerations as sprints?
That was really just an engagement farming post and not much more on its own without a shit load more context.
Not bothered by sticking with Ange or not for this conversation but at least talk about the reality of things.
Err what?
Get the best possible results but every single elite coach in the world will be trying to wring every last drop of effort out of their players when it comes to the games with the most important results. The idea that you can preserve energy and win elite sports is mental.
Even if you try to preserve energy from one area of the game it will be so you can use it somewhere else. There are no easy wins in elite sport. Every single elite athlete is constantly pushing the envelope to expend more energy and find the next level.
If you go 5-0 up in the first half, your coaching has been successful.
Impossible to get 100% out of 100% of players in any game. Coaches will almost always be asking for it tho, because the moment you give an athlete the idea they don't need to give 100%, is the moment you start losing. You can tell them when to change gear and what period or phase of game you want to attack but that's not the same as not going 100% and every single coach will be doing that. Be under no illusions that Ange doesn't pick phases and periods to attack just because of what he says in press conferences. And again, that's not me defending Ange to say let's keep him.