How's it not relevant to Ange when discussing his potential replacement? Surely you're going to measure the guy potentially coming in against the guy potentially going out?
You're determined that anyone potentially coming in is a bad fit for one intangible reason or another, if it's a guy overperforming on limited resources like Frank it's "he's only ever finished midtable, players won't respect him", when it was Glasner in question who has quanitifiably achieved more at Europe's elite level in the past 5 years and finished miles above Ange with a team that has far less resources and had their best player taken off them in the summer, recovering from a winless period of their first 11 games, it's a "sideways step", and we talk about a proven winner in Inzaghi who has 2 CL final appearances and a Serie A title in the last 3 years all while never spending more than 30m euros on a single player and it means fuck all because Inter have a bigger wage budget than the other teams in the league?
You are playing devil's advocate in the extreme lately to back your horse, that's fine, it's the internet, people do it, but I've no interest in indulging it further.