• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
I think we're missing the real major points.

First off Frankball or Thomasball sound absolutely ridiculous so unlikely to take off. A major win.

Secondly the Danish seem a fairly well rounded bunch so it feels unlikely they'll be running onto here or elsewhere chirping up that Frank is some sort of deity who invented football.
if they get out of line we can just make fun of the fart towns
 
If you were to repeat that statement to most football fans that had absolutely no other details of what’s happened over the last two seasons, then they’d think we were nuts to sack him…… but if you were then to add context to that statement there’s a fair chance they’d change their mind!

The you add the context to explain some of the things you want to explain to them, like working with a disgruntled medical team on the way out and half a medical team the year after. Plus a drastically slashed wage bill and 4 teenagers added in one season plus the expectation to give serious minutes to another teenager from the academy

And they realize that those two season outcomes are what they are; outstanding. Over achievements
 
Kind of like saying Leicester City were obviously title challengers in 15/16 as they had Schmeichel, Chilwell, Vardy, Mahrez, and Kante.
Maybe not title challengers, but in retrospect they absolutely should never have been anywhere near relegation favorites with the players they had.

50% fluke, 25% other top teams being shit, 25% the squad was actually that good in a way no one knew
The thing that captivates me about Frank the most is his ability to develop so many top players
Absolutely, you and Levy both. Definitely a top-notch player development coach.
 
This thread is not the real world. Ange is very very popular especially amongst the younger crowd. Especially after Bilbao.

Not that this should have anything to do with making a football decision but he is much more popular than this thread makes out.
Being popular amongst certain groups doesn't mean he's a popular manager overall. General fanbase is fairly split as to whether he deserves to stay on or not.
 
LOL

"I don't think you can guarantee we finish bottom 3-4 again under Ange.".... I dont think club will allow Ange the same leeway even if he is once again taking us on the same path.

"You say it like it's a given clearly forgetting he finished 5th in his first season" - But you seem to forget that first season we had no Europe. Given Ange cant compete with PL & EL, you can forget he will make us compete in both PL & CL next season...

"How many ppg did Frank get against Spurs last season under shitty Ange?" - zero... But magically, same Frank finished 18 pts above Spurs, outscoring Spurs in the process and conceding less as well...Moral : We can all put out stats that can match our agenda....

For someone who wants Ange gone, you seem to want to hang on to him.
Would rather hang on to him than replace him with mid table cloggers with no winning pedigree. Frank has had 4 seasons of PL football with no European commitment and best finish was 9th. Makes 5th look amazing.
 
Hoeness got Stuttgart CL qualification last year and won them a cup this year after his team was sold or injured

He’s a different level to Frank.

If that was the Ange replacement, it would make sense to pull the trigger… probably

Dont confuse things....

Ange HAS to go. Trying to make it as if , Frank is inferior to Ange is just tiresome.

Ange will never survive managing Brentford with his tactics...not for the 4+ seasons Frank has done. After the league season we just had, it will be significant achievement for Ange if he gets another PL job. Only chance he has is, if somehow gets a side promoted from championship. Its harsh opinion but if you put out a poll to all the fans of mid lower table teams in PL , Ange wont get majority to be their manager

Frank vs Hoeness - different conversation. Difficult choice but I might go for Hoeness too...
 
giphy.gif
 
Would rather hang on to him than replace him with mid table cloggers with no winning pedigree. Frank has had 4 seasons of PL football with no European commitment and best finish was 9th. Makes 5th look amazing.

If Frank has to win things and finish in top half with Brentford, then Ange has to win treble with this Tottenham squad....

See - I can also say nonsensical idiotic things...

If the logic that 19th highest wages Brentford has to win things and be in Europe.... then Tottenham should also be winning PL, FA Cup and in Europe... Am sure you will agree...right ?
 
The you add the context to explain some of the things you want to explain to them, like working with a disgruntled medical team on the way out and half a medical team the year after. Plus a drastically slashed wage bill and 4 teenagers added in one season plus the expectation to give serious minutes to another teenager from the academy

And they realize that those two season outcomes are what they are; outstanding. Over achievements
I can’t see how other than a Busby Babes type scenario, that finishing 17th could ever be seen as an overachievement, trophy or not!

If it was an overachievement his balls wouldn’t be on the chopping block!
 
Being popular amongst certain groups doesn't mean he's a popular manager overall. General fanbase is fairly split as to whether he deserves to stay on or not.

Sure but there's a massive generational split. I'd put it from my own anecdotal experience at about %60-40 OUT amongst older people and %70-30 IN amongst under 30's.

This is also backed up by online and social media polls and Reddit etc...

Also anecdotally there's one bloke in our section top of the South who is what I'd call a "Fat Cunt ANGE OUT Cultist" - he is universally despised by all the rest of us around him when the majority are also Ange Out but are NOT massive cunts about it. :D

This also gels with my experience in Bilbao and afterwards.
 
I can’t see how other than a Busby Babes type scenario, that finishing 17th could ever be seen as an overachievement, trophy or not!

If it was an overachievement his balls wouldn’t be on the chopping block!
Yeah I wouldn't call it an overachievement. I see his tenure more as a successful ticking off of the things he was hired for.

1. Break our trophy duck ✅
2. Turn over the squad and get younger, weathering the loss of Kane ✅
3. Impose an attacking, front-foot, possession-based style of play, flushing Jose and Conte out of the system ✅

That's not post-hoc rationalization. Go look at the first pages of this thread. He did what we asked of him.
 
If Ange had to go. It should and must have been done immediately after Brighton if there was a football reality to face.

That it’s been left to drift is typical ENIC ineptitude and a sacking now would result in even more unnecessary distractions. So, on the basis of giving a very fragile squad a chance to recover I’d have to accept that Ange staying is right. Because quite clearly this ownership can’t afford to be successful in which case we need to stay up and away from the relegation zone. That’s clearly hard for this squad, so making it more brittle is not going to help. Ange is likely the most capable of getting them safe ( fucking hate writing such a sentence )

However, Mr Buyrite is almost certainly sitting on this for financial reasons. I wouldn’t be the slightest bit surprised if sacking Ange at a certain point is some kind of accounting trick and Danny knows the coffers can’t deal with £10m in sacking, bonus and new manager payments. And that’s the only reason for the delay.

Daniel seems to know the price of everything and the value of nothing. As history - his history - confirms if we dare to look.

Sacked a manager at half time.

Sacked a manager 6 days before a cup final.

And now can’t bare to sack someone who lost 30 odd games over the past year. Cowards come to mind when I think of our board.
 
Back
Top