We are also closer to Bournemouth in 17th than we are Woolwich.
Data analysis doesn’t work from eyeballing it and focusing on the individual case. Just accept this isn’t a debate suited to the way you think, it more of an objective thing mate. Doesn’t mean you are 100% wrong in your own subjective way of looking at things just means it’s not your type of debate.
Mate, I manage and analyse data professionally.... so let’s clear this up now: statistical analysis is not pure objectivity. It’s shaped by the framing, the variables you choose and the comparisons you make, and the assumptions you build in. You’re misusing the concept to shut down debate because you have lost all bearing and have nothing else to add.
Now, to break down the gaslighting, flip-flopping, and misdirection happening here:
My original point—Liverpool won the league without buying elite players on elite wages—is factual, not subjective.
You jumped in claiming Salah and Alisson were bought on elite wages. That’s provably false.
Then you pivoted to total transfer cost....but only once the wage angle stopped working.
Then back to wages.
Then back to the transfer cost again.
When that didn’t land, you pivoted to tone, hilariously implying I don’t “get” how this type of debate works. But all that really shows is that you’ve run out of ground and are leaning on condescension.
You invoked a general statistical trend about wages correlating with league position something which I never denied.... I said it’s not the full story, especially at the top. And the fact that Liverpool outperformed clubs with vastly bigger wage bills - 4 of them actually - supports that. That’s not me ignoring data. That’s me understanding it in context.....which you’ve refused to do from the start.
I see your game, my friend. I spend much of my day debating far more in-depth data than this with far smarter people than you.