The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
It would be shame, but we also can't allow it to hold up the rest of our summer. Switch focus to other target areas and let the legal team deal with this.Be a real shame if we don't get him. I think he'd have a massive impact in this team.
Grit, vision, long and short passing and an eye for goal, and great work ethic.
A real team player.
Similar qualities to Stevie G imo. Not quite as good obviously but he's a very, very good player.
They can't, but Gibbs-White can.
The player isn't willing to do this the ugly way, it's over.
It’s a very bizarre situation.
What I would say though is I think it’s very naive to assume we have acted 100% correctly here either.
If it was a case that we had activated a release clause completely correctly and done nothing wrong, we would without question have briefed the media to that effect. The fact no club mouthpiece has come out with that would say to me that it’s not that straightforward.
You are proving my point. There's no way he was ever going to sign a new contract.TBF, much as I hated Ange as a manager, Kane didn't say that. He said he wouldn't sign a new contract with 1 year left.
He actually said he would stay if no one paid what he was worth.
How generous of him...TBF, much as I hated Ange as a manager, Kane didn't say that. He said he wouldn't sign a new contract with 1 year left.
He actually said he would stay if no one paid what he was worth.
Yes. Anyone with a release clause at Forest should be talking to their agent and asking wtf is the legal position Not good for the TreesSurely any player at Forest is now talking to their agent about how they could leave in the future? Why would you want to be held at ransom because an owner can't handle being outwitted?
How have Forest "done Crystal Palace super dirty"?Spot on can you believe these people. It's not 'spoiled' anything. In fact I'm breaking out the singel Malt when this gets done. We haven't actually broken any rules. These odd teams randomly hate us any way so screw them into the dirt and move on. Forrest have Done Crystal Palace super dirty they are not some moral high ground.
they got them kicked out of Europa League
This contract is to be treated as being private and confidential and its contents shall not be disclosed or divulged either directly or indirectly to any person firm or company whatsoever either by the Club the Player or any Football Agent of the Club or the Player except:
16.1 with the prior written agreement of both the Club and the Player;
Borson's claim that us asking MGW's agent "what do we need to bid here to get the player?" (around the 8:30 mark) is borderline inducement is ridiculous. Surely that's just a standard first question you'd ask of any agent about any player of interest under any set of circumstances; it doesn't imply any foreknowledge of a release clause nor does it imply intent to induce a breach of confidence.
Funny how Marinakis isn't mentioned on Forests board, chairman or directors at all. If he put his shares in a blind trust, is he truly allowed to be involved?
A lot of interesting and relevant stuff here in the PL rulebook, but just to note, in the standard player contract which all clubs and players must use (subject to addition and modification I'm sure, but still)
Ever really considered how damaging the word hate is?TBF, much as I hated Ange as a manager, Kane didn't say that. He said he wouldn't sign a new contract with 1 year left.
He actually said he would stay if no one paid what he was worth.
Which would—if this the standard form of words—make all release clauses confidential
A lot of interesting and relevant stuff here in the PL rulebook, but just to note, in the standard player contract which all clubs and players must use (subject to addition and modification I'm sure, but still)
I think this has been covered before; he regained control on or around 13th June when it became clear there would be no conflict of interest.Funny how Marinakis isn't mentioned on Forests board, chairman or directors at all. If he put his shares in a blind trust, is he truly allowed to be involved?
Your point was Kane saying he wouldn't play for Ange.You are proving my point. There's no way he was ever going to sign a new contract.
Grassed Palace up for having dual ownership when the same applies to your lot.
As with almost all transfers. It's speculation at best.Borson's claim that us asking MGW's agent "what do we need to bid here to get the player?" (around the 8:30 mark) is borderline inducement is ridiculous. Surely that's just a standard first question you'd ask of any agent about any player of interest under any set of circumstances; it doesn't imply any foreknowledge of a release clause nor does it imply intent to induce a breach of confidence.