• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers The Summer Transfer Edging Thread 2025

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

I’ve been outspoken on how much I don’t rate Lookman but if it’s him, fuck it, he’s still probably better than Johnson.
 
There's just not the CL squad space to sign two senior attackers. Leaving too many out will create an unhappy dressing room.
Sounds like you've played Football Manager - I used to have this problem every bloody time

Kang from PSG for me - proper footballer who could interchange with Simons on the left/ in the centre - not convinced that Lookman improves us personally and as some others have said feel like he'd end up as expensive deadwood
 
What worries me is he flopped in the PL last time
My main thing is people are going to have the same complaints about him as they do Johnson, Lookman is 5ft5 and strong on the ball but not a defensive contributor, if played off the left his remit will largely be to ignore the transitional phases and look to finish moves with goals and assists, which is basically Johnson's remit now. You're largely hoping his superior dribbling ability means he's a more effective contributor on that side, and that his prolific goalscoring form for Atalanta playing up front in a 2 can translate to the PL playing on the left as a wide forward. It's a move fraught with risk IMO but I am of the opinion that since we do actually have bodies at LW (albeit nowhere near good or experienced enough) then we're making the move based on Frank's tactical vision, which I do think will include formation switches on the fly which having versatile players like Lookman can only be useful for.
 
Before we bought Kudus if you asked me who is better Lookman or Kudus I probably would have said Lookman. Kudus hasn’t been a bad signing. Kudus, Simons and Lookman would be a very good attack.

Yeah i agree with that. He wouldnt be my first choice but it seems a nice balanced attacking 3 and for sure a couple of levels up from johnson/sarr/kudus.

I know hes struggled with injuries recently but I think those 3 behind solanke would work really well. No doubt richys been better recently but I think solanke is abit more switched on and a stronger runner to benefit from what those 3 would serve up going forwards.
 
5 at the back you need good rotation at wing back, we only have 3 and Udogie is injured a fair bit.
Yes, true.

Spence is brilliant cover as he can play on the right too (might even be better there), but we would only have one rotation option.

I’m just wondering why we’re being linked with another CB when we have 4 (plus Archie).

We’ll find out tomorrow. If we do go for Lookman then it looks like we’ll be sticking with 3/4/3.
 
Back
Top