Hmm, I have nothing to say. Your arguments have so many assumptions when many facts are out there that when crossed referenced will make your points invalid.
But I don't have time for this lol. He's gone and I know nothing will change people's perception of him anyways.
Which is fine, but people are criticising the current manager in a way that rewrites history. You can look back through every manager, even to Poch's reign, and see signs of defeatism, or "reality", not understanding how the fans think etc. It wasn't remotely as big as it is now. Previous manager actively criticised fans, argued with them, cupped his ear to them, and that's seemingly no where near as antagonising as a passive description of the current state of the top 4
I don't know why it's being wheeled out as confirmation bias now. People were jumping on him saying "top, top" early on, as if it really matters. You'll have people saying stuff like "he should be sacked because he won't give a timeline on Solanke" and other really odd things like that.
People used to say that Levy used to shield himself behind the managers, but to me it looks like Levy himself was the criticism shield. People are pinning everything on the way Frank talks, looks, and the nuances of his adjectives because there's no clear idea of who exactly is running the club and making decisions
