This is an interesting comment and requires some unpacking.You’re really reaching trying to demonstrate Ange is a better coach than Poch!
Ange has won trophies everywhere he's gone and stayed at least two seasons. More often than not he won something in his first season.
Those trophies may have been mostly in 2nd class leagues but he had to win using the cattle he had - sometimes in salary capped leagues. How would Poch have gone in those salary capped leagues - where the only variable for success tends to be the head coach?
Then there's the Asian Cup - the Asian equivalent of the Euros. This is a tremendously difficult competition to win and Ange did it using only (obviously) the players available via their Australian passports. Few on here will realise what an immense achievement that was but it's an insight into the cult of Ange and why so many fans from his previous clubs still follow his every move. Especially Celtic fans.
Pep is on record as saying Ange is one of the best coaches in the world (when he was still at Yokohama) and I for one doubt whether Poch (or anyone else) could have done as well with the resources available.
Having said all that, there is an undeniable quality gap between the EPL and every other level Ange has coached at. Maybe there's a thoroughbred effect from which only super-elite coaches can benefit...
But let's not forget Spurs came fifth in Ange's first season and won a major trophy in his second. Sure he made priority choices in the 2nd but let's not confuse that with quality of coaching. On some indicators, Ange is clearly better than Poch.


