I donāt agree with this narrative of yours, mate. Letās take a look back at our managers.
Redknapp - came in, steered us away from relegation and finished top half. Spent a few seasons at Spurs before he was linked with England job and we bottled 3rd place. At the end of that season he got sacked. Was it harsh? Maybe.
AVB - finished 5th in his first season, but we played a lot of passive football, Bale saved our bacon time and time again. After Bale left, we were beaten left and right and AVB got sacked. He barely produced much as manager afterwards anyway. So was sack justified? Probably.
Sherwood - stop gap.
Pochettino - no need to discuss, just that was his sacking justified? Iād say at the time of it, I think it was because we werenāt getting results and our football was becoming sterile for a while. Maybe he shouldāve been afforded the season as transition and see where weād end up, after all heās probably earned it after all heās done for the club.
Mourinho - washed up imo, initial managerial bounce then shit. Sacking him before the League Cup final is seen as a capital sin, personally I think it wouldnāt have made a difference, we were trash under him.
Mason - stop gap.
Nuno - banter appointment. Most people knew it wasnāt going to work. Donāt know if Levy/Paratici thought it was a stop gap until Conte agreed to take over, but imo Nuno shouldāve never been hired. It was a farce how long it took them to get us a manager and when they did, it was fucking Nuno.
Conte - very bright start of his Spurs stint, finished top 4, but in the second season people started to moan about the football and his rigid tactics. His post-Southampton press conference probably sealed his faith, I think he wouldnāt have been sacked if he didnāt criticize the players and the board in public. Who knows what mightāve happened after that, our fans said Conte never wanted to be here and he wanted the sack, so in a way he had to go?
Stellini + Mason - lol.
Postecoglou - came in, we started the season very well and although heās had to deal with injuries, the football we played gradually became worse. We lost 4 in a row against two injury depleted sides where we played like shit. Doesnāt want to adjust his tactics to accomodate players. Needs money to make his system work. Sounds a bit like Conte, doesnāt it?
So overall, itās not like we sacked managers simply because we hit a bumpy road and said fuck it, letās give someone else in. Our managers didnāt look like they could turn it around. And on top of that, you could argue some appointments have been completely wrong to begin with.
So yeah, would we āsackā Postecoglou simply because we canāt handle some defeats? No, itās because the progress under him has been minimal and the signs look like heās hit a point where he might not be able to turn it around.
Pretty good post that, though with Poch the 'parting of ways' was by mutual agreement. Let's not forget that he was twerking for a move on the eve of the CL Final.
With AP, you need to factor in that we've essentially ripped up the plan, or lack thereof, that preceded him. We're in the process of instigating a different style of play, with everything from the board to the playing staff changed last Summer. That doesn't happen overnight and I'm hard pressed to recall any team that's managed to do that, which is why the likes of Arteta, Klopp and Pep are cited as comparisons. You might not like it, but they're viable comparisons. A further example of this is Potter. It took him a few seasons to get Brighton playing the way he wanted. So many were banging on about De Zerbi, but he inherited the foundations that Potter had built, and got enormous plaudits even though all he really did was polish the diamond.
AP is still in the process of turning the coal we had into that diamond, and that takes time. Whether he will, and whether he's able to polish it as well, only time and backing will tell.
Comparing him to Conte, as far as needing money, is a bit disingenuous too. EVERY manager needs money and time to get in the players they need. The difference between the two though is that AP isn't demanding the absolute elite, for the highest transfer fees and highest wages. He wants the right players to fit his requirements of ability and, most importantly, temperament. If they happen to be the most expensive players on the market, then he absolutely MUST be backed to make this work.
You don't think this will happen, which is fair enough considering our past history under ENIC, but I feel that it will happen, though that may be more hope than absolute belief. Again, only time will tell.
One thing is for sure, bailing at the first sign of adversity has not worked for us in any way, shape or form.
I've seen a few on here quoting Einstein's statement that doing the same thing and expecting different outcomes is madness, but you can't just cherry pick that quote to suit certain arguments.
We really need to stay the course IMO. We have ample examples of the success this can bring in the Prem now, so why not take a leaf out of that book?