• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%

  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%
  • Total voters
    113
Ange is doing more damage each week so at the moment we are not that attractive for any worthwhile proven manager only another guy who can't believe his luck he has landed a nice well paid gig with a bumper payoff when he is found out .
 
enfield1985 said:
Ange is like a Cancer who cause sensible people to say stupid things. He is a cult to his followers from all evidence should have been gone months ago, but his true believers want to give him another week even though we have only won 9 premier league games since May last year.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Ange reminds me of Stellini’s results (and Ramos’ chaos). Mason is just Mason - Sherwood v2 but less arrogant.
 
Shadydan said:
Dude we're not going to agree on this, it's cool
I just think the idea to sack this dude (which he more than deserves by the way) to replace him with a less experienced dude in a see what happens and roll the dice scenario is just pure desperation.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

giphy.gif
 
Klaus said:
Fair on you mate for getting a source but it sounds like conjecture:

"It is also worth noting that sacking him could cost the club £12million and it is very unlike Spurs to part ways with such funds unless it is absolutely necessary."

ie, guesswork based on his salary.

Knowing Levy, and given the fact he'll have known the average length of a manager at Spurs is about 18 months, I'd be shocked if he didn't stipulate any payout would be far lower than the rest of his contract.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I don’t disagree with that. It seems ludicrous at best.
 
Jaco said:
Ofc it is true. Basic contract law.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Literally isn't, but sure.

Graham Potter compensation increases Chelsea's need for summer exodus

Graham Potter is set to be paid £13m in compensation after being sacked by Chelsea - taking their spending on managerial costs to over £50m in just nine months and increasing their need for a mass sale of players this summer​

Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

That's Potter who was on a contract of £12m a year. Got one year's payoff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top