If its all about your very simplistic way of looking at things there should have been no debate about Anges future in the summer then? And yet he got the sack.
I never downplay us winning a trophy or say it isnt a great achievement for our history books. I am judging the manager and his involvement in the whole thing. And just because he won a trophy with us I don't see him as any sort of manager-wizard and its all about how we go forward.
Its like saying Roberto di Matteo is a manager genious for winning the CL with Chelsea against Bayern Munich and achieved something, Conte or Mourinho couldn't do at Chelsea. He did well but also got lucky because he could never recreate some sort of similiar success in his managerial career.
I always said thanks Ange for the trophy, you gambled and win here and gave us a brillant moment but still think he is not what we need ever again. It is maybe a judgement for people who have more than a Ange good or Ange bad view.
No it's not because no-one is making this argument apart from you, this is the 2nd time you've used words like 'genius' and 'messiah' and 'wizard'? Tell me when exactly have I used these terms about Ange? why do you keep doing this?
And no it's not like Di Matteo at all because Ange has won trophies everyone he's been at so he obviously has a knack to winning, again something that our previous managers have failed to achieve, these are the facts, why are you trying to argue against factual evidence?