• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 72 64.3%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.7%

  • Total voters
    112
I still credit him with the City game. We were the first team to beat them, then we were the first to beat them in their own back yard in like 50 games and we've done them twice in quick succession. They still have world class talent all over the pitch.

I feel it would be churlish to take that away from him because 4-0 wasn't just a win, we buried them. Away from home.

Still doesn't stop me from questioning his position though.

Right place, right time.
They are fascinating me right now, in terms of trying to identify the problem. I think it's actually multiple problems.
Their recruitment has actually been shite.
In 22/23 they signed (other than Haaland) Ortega, Phillips, Akanji, Perroen?, Ruprecht?, Gomez?, Agyemang?
In 23/24 they signed Kovacic (29 at the time) Gvardiol, Doko, Nunes, Baptiste?, Echeverri?
In 24/25 they signed Savinho, Gundogan, Mabama?

Their squad has been getting older. They have sold the likes of Alvarez, Cancelo, Palmer, Mahrez, Laporte, Jesus, Sterling, Zincenko etc.
The players coming in have largely been of lower quality than the ones that left or are getting older. Players like Walker have suddenly gone from being the best to being too old and slow.
Some are suggesting the sporting director that left is the reason and that's why he's gone. It's possible. It's also possible they know something big is coming down the pipeline with those charges.
I also think Pep and a lot of the longer serving players are unmotivated. They have won everything, multiple times. What keeps them interested?

They have Forest at home Wednesday. Nono has form for beating them when they were good. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that ends 0-0 or a narrow win for Forest tbh. And that's only because Forest will play with caution.
 
And thats fair enough mate. I completely get the frustration, sure I feel it too and it pains me that we haven't kicked on this season!

My POV is that there is no quick fix. I don't see any long term benefit to sacking Ange mid season and taking a punt on Frank/Silva/Ireola
I would disagree. The bloke has proven to me he is out of his depth at this level and I see nothing that makes me believe that he can/will turn things around.I also believe had he not had the 10 game start he had to his Tottenham career that he had then he would have been gone by now.
Getting rid now and bringing in a new manager (Frank for me) would give the new guy 2 windows and a proper pre-season and 30+ games to implement his style of football.
 
Right place, right time.
They are fascinating me right now, in terms of trying to identify the problem. I think it's actually multiple problems.
Their recruitment has actually been shite.
In 22/23 they signed (other than Haaland) Ortega, Phillips, Akanji, Perroen?, Ruprecht?, Gomez?, Agyemang?
In 23/24 they signed Kovacic (29 at the time) Gvardiol, Doko, Nunes, Baptiste?, Echeverri?
In 24/25 they signed Savinho, Gundogan, Mabama?

Their squad has been getting older. They have sold the likes of Alvarez, Cancelo, Palmer, Mahrez, Laporte, Jesus, Sterling, Zincenko etc.
The players coming in have largely been of lower quality than the ones that left or are getting older. Players like Walker have suddenly gone from being the best to being too old and slow.
Some are suggesting the sporting director that left is the reason and that's why he's gone. It's possible. It's also possible they know something big is coming down the pipeline with those charges.
I also think Pep and a lot of the longer serving players are unmotivated. They have won everything, multiple times. What keeps them interested?

They have Forest at home Wednesday. Nono has form for beating them when they were good. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that ends 0-0 or a narrow win for Forest tbh. And that's only because Forest will play with caution.
theyve downgraded the squad massively in the last 3 years. other than haaland, savinho and gvardiol, the rest of them are not anywhere near good enough to be joining the best team in the world. bringing back gundogan is a mad one. its all falling apart there now.

letting alvarez go was a mistake too, he was perfect to not only cover haaland but gave them different dynamic in the final third and he could also play just behind the front man.

peps obsession with trying to force rico lewis to be a big player is strange too, hes way off that level, reminds me of winks for us. like a boy out there against men and makes them so much weaker.
 
"You have to play tough opposition and games that won't go smoothly for you," said the Spurs boss. "I know people will keep using City as a reference point, but against City I could bring on [Timo] Werner and [Brennan] Johnson with Vicario in goal.

"I guess people are looking for easy targets, but people don’t understand what we’re doing at the moment and how the players are coping with it.

"We’re going to have to have days like today where things aren’t running smoothly but all you have to ask for is the players do what they can."

Asked what he meant by "easy targets" and if it was in relation to the boos, Posteocglou replied: "I’m not talking about the supporters, I’ve had already three questions on the Man City game and why can’t we repeat that.

"But if you can't see that in the last seven days we've lost significant players since then. It's too easy to say that we have to play like against Man City every game.

"It seems with this club, whatever we do well is used to bring us down in every opportunity"



It’s genuinely astounding how much of a grifter this man is. The level of self-serving, narcissistic nonsense in his comments is unmatched, he comes across as a smooth-brained, room-temperature-IQ-level clown.

For a manager who’s achieved relatively little in the grand scheme of things, he speaks with the confidence of someone who’s revolutionized the sport. Instead, what we get is a steady stream of excuses, deflections, and outright absurdities.

Let’s take his claim about City and the inability to replicate that performance because he couldn’t bring on… Timo Werner. Yes, the world-class game-changer Timo Werner was apparently the missing piece. The joke writes itself. It’s not just a bad excuse—it’s an insult to anyone with even a basic understanding of football or with a pair of eyeballs and a functioning brain.

And the rest of his comments? It’s like he’s running a masterclass in dodging accountability. “People just don’t get it, guys. What we’re doing is so complex! It's Angeball mate! We're going to have days like today!" Days like today? This isn’t a one-off occurrence; it’s a recurring theme throughout the season. Injuries? Sure, let’s blame those too—because apparently, we were flying high and dominating the entire season before they happened. Spoiler: we weren’t.

Then there’s this gem: “Whatever we do well is used to bring us down.” Oh, please. Criticism doesn’t come from a place of malicious intent; it comes because this team shows glimpses of potential, only to regress due to his baffling decisions and stubborn adherence to a system that clearly isn’t working in this league. If you think this is “bringing us down,” you’ve completely missed the point of constructive criticism.

His entire approach reminds me of a caricature of a clueless, entitled valley girl. Replace Ange with a spoiled socialite, and his press conferences practically write themselves: “Like, OMG, guys, why are you so mad? We literally won last week! Chill, it’s not like this has been happening all season or anything!”

The reality is, Ange comes across as a manager more interested in protecting his ego than in reflecting on or addressing his mistakes. It’s all talk, no substance—and frankly, it’s embarrassing. At some point, he needs to stop deflecting and start delivering, or we’re just spinning our wheels with a manager whose arrogance far outweighs his ability.

Better managers have been sacked for far less at this football club.

Lol - he said, basically: "Since City I've lost my keeper and my striker on top of an already significant injury list"

Which is, of course, absolutely true. Any manager would point to an injury crisis like this as a reason for dropped levels. Especially when he's entering a 3 week period that will likely end with his sacking.

You didn't have to write an overwrought essay acting as if he's personally spat in your face. :roflmao:
 
I have to be honest, I didn't see this much of a decline coming from City.
I always had a feeling that eventually Pep would run out of ways to keep players playing his style of football. It happened at Barca. It happened at Bayern. I was a little surprised he renewed his contract. I thought maybe he would take a year off and then surface in an oil league or at PSG.
The fact he signed that deal makes it very interesting now. I can't see them sacking him, but I can't see them turning this decline around. The way they're going they'll be out of the top 6 this season which is mind blowing really.

From an optics point of view, I think they'll ask him to resign if this carries on. They can't be seen to be sacking him, not with his record and stature in the game.
 
But it’s true. And unfortunately us Aussies call a spade a spade. There’s zero bullshitting.

Except in this case its bullshit. Of course journalists are going to talk/reference the fact we went to City's ground 4-0 but in between that lost to Ipswich and got completely outplayed at home to Fulham. As if they wouldn't do the same for ANY club and point out the inconsistency and game raising tendencies.

But yeah, much better to bring up some sort of victim complex and act like its because the meanie media hate us rather than accept its a valid fucking question.
 
Except in this case its bullshit. Of course journalists are going to talk/reference the fact we went to City's ground 4-0 but in between that lost to Ipswich and got completely outplayed at home to Fulham. As if they wouldn't do the same for ANY club and point out the inconsistency and game raising tendencies.

But yeah, much better to bring up some sort of victim complex and act like its because the meanie media hate us rather than accept its a valid fucking question.

Absolutely.

However, you can also (should you choose) look at it from Postecoglou's POV where none of the journo's asking the question mentioned that inbetween the City game and Fulham game he'd lost his striker and goalkeeper to add to an already massive injury list.

Meanwhile over at Sky they spent 30 minutes discussing how much Rodri/De Bruyne missing means to City and how Odegaard (1 fucking player!) cost Scum precious points in the league.

I'd be fucking pissed off too if it was my job on the line :D
 
I have to be honest, I didn't see this much of a decline coming from City.
I always had a feeling that eventually Pep would run out of ways to keep players playing his style of football. It happened at Barca. It happened at Bayern. I was a little surprised he renewed his contract. I thought maybe he would take a year off and then surface in an oil league or at PSG.
The fact he signed that deal makes it very interesting now. I can't see them sacking him, but I can't see them turning this decline around. The way they're going they'll be out of the top 6 this season which is mind blowing really.

From an optics point of view, I think they'll ask him to resign if this carries on. They can't be seen to be sacking him, not with his record and stature in the game.
rodri back next year will make them drastically improve, but by then youre right they could be out of the CL. it looks like thats going to be the case. especially as he keeps playing super lightweight midfields. if he gave the midfield some steel to protect the defence he has the forwards to do enough damage on their own, doesnt need to be rocket science.

haaland, bernado, foden, grealish, savinho and KDB...they will go and get you top 4 on their own if you make sure the defence is fairly solid. top 4 minimum!
 
Lol - he said, basically: "Since City I've lost my keeper and my striker on top of an already significant injury list"

Which is, of course, absolutely true. Any manager would point to an injury crisis like this as a reason for dropped levels. Especially when he's entering a 3 week period that will likely end with his sacking.

You didn't have to write an overwrought essay acting as if he's personally spat in your face. :roflmao:
Apart from the fact that there hasn’t been an injury crisis all season, yet these same results and patterns have persisted regardless. Let’s not pretend this is some sudden development or an excuse for the performances we’ve been seeing for months.

What we’re witnessing isn’t just bad luck with injuries—it’s a manager desperately deflecting criticism to protect himself at the expense of the football club. And frankly, your attempt to frame my criticism as though I’m acting like he’s personally spat in my face is just another layer of deflection. The reality is, this isn’t about personal offense at all—it’s about standards that I expect from this football club and the manager of it.

I wrote what I wrote because, imo, he doesn’t deserve to be the manager of this football club (like I said, others have been sacked for far less) and it’s frankly insulting to see people continuously handwave his behavior.

How can anyone justify this level of protection for a manager who has delivered so little for us at this point? I’ve never seen a fanbase bend over backward like this for someone whose achievements here are nonexistent, you could argue that we are objectively worse results wise despite playing "better football" Perhaps the real question is: why are you so determined to defend the indefensible?
 
I get a lot of the frustrations with Ange, and there are undoubted issues with some of his approach to tactical setup and substitutions.

But I do still quite like him and back him (I’d probably class myself as wanting to see more before making any rash decisions),The root of a lot of this was the summer though - I just don’t think we had a particularly strong transfer window and we’re really paying the price.

From what I’ve read some of that is on Ange and he’s backed himself too aggressively to polish up some diamonds and not realised the elite level of the PL IMO, but the club haven’t helped either.

For me this is particularly evident in the attacking areas (most of the GK and defensive signings have been decent).

None of Johnson, Solanke or Son (current version) are elite level players and it shows when you watch us play. Odebert is young and TBC, Moore is all potential and Werner isn’t of the required level.

If you compare our attacking options to the clubs in and around us we fall short. Our team would be sooo different with a Salah or a Saka in the side who is a consistent and constant threat to opposing full backs, but also offers a great outlet when under pressure.

I expect the inevitable retort of how many goals we’ve scored, but I don’t think that’s a particularly nuanced way of assessing what goes on in every game. Those attackers contribute to us turning over the ball and allowing dangerous counters time after time.

They also don’t pose enough of a threat to low block defences which we are seeing regularly setup against us.

The big myth is that Spurs have become a spending team over the last few years so board criticism isn’t fair. The reality is whilst transfer spend outlay has been refreshingly high, we’ve avoided anyone on chunky wages to prop up the books and that’s why we still have huge amounts of FFP margin and our wage to turnover ratio is so low.

A 65m player on 150k pw costs much less than a 45m player on 300k pw over a 5 year contract. Attacking signings like Johnson, Werner and Solanke haven’t really been game changers for us in any way.

If you look at this summers signings in particular, only Solanke has made any impact so far, and thus I did think 5th - 7th is where we’d be this season before we got started and that’s looking accurate.

As I said above, I think Ange has some culpability in that but as a club we were ineffective this summer and we’re paying the price currently.

I’m willing to cut Ange some slack because I don’t think our squad is particularly great……
 
Except in this case its bullshit. Of course journalists are going to talk/reference the fact we went to City's ground 4-0 but in between that lost to Ipswich and got completely outplayed at home to Fulham. As if they wouldn't do the same for ANY club and point out the inconsistency and game raising tendencies.

But yeah, much better to bring up some sort of victim complex and act like its because the meanie media hate us rather than accept its a valid fucking question.
That's simply Ange protecting his own image, as per usual. (The media do actually hate us though, that is pretty evident I think, doesn't stop it being a valid question though.)
 
All these people who believe Ange should be sacked, realistically who do you bring in? What top manager in their right mind is going to come to Spurs in it's current state, working with a limited wage budget and transfer budget, with demands to target top 4 over any trophy, and have the fans on them from day one?

It's a genuine question... Who would we attract?
 
Do we? Most of our dropped points have come after a midweek game. It seems to be the main reason why we drop points so often.
Agreed. Forster, Davies, Werner are a massive drop off from Vicario, VDV and Solanke. The squad depth doesn't have enough quality to handle this many injuries.

Bringng on Bergval and Lankshear yesterday to try and win a game is more proof!
 
Back
Top