• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
The bloke has 10 of his players out ansd school kids on the bench and people are calling for his head. What a joke! With all these injuries mid table sounds about right to me. It’s impossible to be near the top with all these player out.

I had a look at Chelsea, Woolwich, Liverpool lineups over the weekend. Each had maximum 3 to 4 players out. You take 10 players out and those clubs are mid table.

You should all be greatful that we’re not in the bottom 3.

If we stick with Ange and are top half come February, we will push hard for top 5 maybe 4th. 8 out of the last 10 games are very winnable.
Not really 10 though is it? How many are actual proven quality first teamers?
 
& frankly that performance was nothing new - we’ve seen what happens when Kane is isolated and well marshalled by a world class central defender.

He, like almost all centre forwards, has always been service reliant in those situations and we didn’t move it quickly enough to really get the Liverpool defence worried at all.

I always find the ‘playing an injured Kane’ to be the easiest of easy cop outs. We gave a close to 100 point side a 1-0 lead early and they had an exceptional defensive spine which just saw it out.

Maybe Lucas gives VVD more to think about at times but I highly doubt it changes the result at all.
Agree with most of that except we didn’t give them a 1-0 lead. They were given a very borderline penalty
 
& frankly that performance was nothing new - we’ve seen what happens when Kane is isolated and well marshalled by a world class central defender.

He, like almost all centre forwards, has always been service reliant in those situations and we didn’t move it quickly enough to really get the Liverpool defence worried at all.

I always find the ‘playing an injured Kane’ to be the easiest of easy cop outs. We gave a close to 100 point side a 1-0 lead early and they had an exceptional defensive spine which just saw it out.

Maybe Lucas gives VVD more to think about at times but I highly doubt it changes the result at all.

Yeah. We will never know.

But watching us play through April it was pretty clear without Kane poch was trying to figure out the best lineup.

Moura never stood out as being the answer at CF. Llorente would offer aerial ability but not much else.
We all know the reality of playing Son CF.

Given the options I know Poch would make that same choice again. You just have to roll the dice. And hope Sissoko keeps his arms down!
 
Cup campaigns will probably make or break this season in particular, and his future here in general.

In terms of league, I don't see us getting out of the purgatory that we're in at the moment. Our matches are virtual coin filps due to end-to-end, high variance football Ange gets us playing. So, I expect us to go on a run at some point. Like how you'll find instances of runs in consecutive coin flips. That'll make sure we won't get stuck in the bottom half. However, at the same time, a way larger sample since last November tells us that we're a mid-table team. So we'll probably neither sink nor swim, but float somewhere between 4th and 10th.

That being said, cups are an entirely different story due to their one game shoot out nature. If what I said about our matches being coin flips is true, then it's certainly conceivable to go on a run and win at least one of them. There being three of them only increases the odds in our favour. So if Levy-board already have no reservations about him despite 13 months of mid-table form, then a cup win would certainly win them over to give him at least another season. Unlike this summer, they may even consider going all-in in the market according to his wishes.

So make of that what you will. If you think we're a cursed club then go assume that we'll go to the final of all 3 cups only to lose each of them in penalties. If you tend to live in the clouds then assume that he's a lock for winning 3 trophies this season. Both are within the realms of possibility.
Posted this in another thread.

Seems like he's in this weird position where even though he's mostly safe for the season, he won't have a leg to stand on in the summer if he doesn't deliver a cup. Or at least go on a deep run in the more prestigious EL.

They've been tolerating a mid-table form for 13 months already. I assume it's less about standing with him rather than avoiding another Mason tenure at all costs. That Conte-Stellini-Mason debacle probably left a sour taste in their mouths as well. So they're choosing to stick with him, in the hope that he'll eventually bring silverware or achieve something else that'd warrant giving him more time and support.

Seems more like a suspension of judgment rather than a vote of confidence to me. My guess is that they're treating him as an "interim-disguised as-full-timer", with burden of proof being on him to earn himself another year and -possibly- proper backing in the market. Their reluctance this summer to invest in this "project" seems to point in the same direction. They just don't want to end up like United, spending a fortune on a manager that proved to be a failure.
 
You can be a Spurs fans and point out our problems.
This idea that supporting a football club means you have to live in constant denial is nonsense.

It’s so tiring, honestly just such a stupid, boring fucking narrative.

You don’t think this manager is good enough for the club, and therefore because you express that on a discussion forum you must actively hate the club, WANT us to lose and not celebrate goals. Bore off.

I cheer every goal and want us to win every game, I’d love to be proved wrong, it just so happens that I think we’ll finish with empty hands again and spend more time than we should on someone who I personally believe clearly won’t get us anywhere.

He probably isn’t going this season, fine. So I back the team, I still want us to win every game just like I always have but it doesn’t mean I’m going to suddenly start saying it’s all fantastic and that he must be the guy because someone told me he was.
 
Posted this in another thread.

Seems like he's in this weird position where even though he's mostly safe for the season, he won't have a leg to stand on in the summer if he doesn't deliver a cup. Or at least go on a deep run in the more prestigious EL.

They've been tolerating a mid-table form for 13 months already. I assume it's less about standing with him rather than avoiding another Mason tenure at all costs. That Conte-Stellini-Mason debacle probably left a sour taste in their mouths as well. So they're choosing to stick with him, in the hope that he'll eventually bring silverware or achieve something else that'd warrant giving him more time and support.

Seems more like a suspension of judgment rather than a vote of confidence to me. My guess is that they're treating him as an "interim-disguised as-full-timer", with burden of proof being on him to earn himself another year and -possibly- proper backing in the market. Their reluctance this summer to invest in this "project" seems to point in the same direction. They just don't want to end up like United, spending a fortune on a manager that proved to be a failure.
Table position and Cups get the headlines but I suspect his role description / KPIs put a few other things before that:
  • Oversee a rebuild targeting title challenge 2025/26 onwards (last transfer window King of confirms this)
  • Cultural change to re-establish attacking football and challenge "Spursy" myth
  • Help align/ unify PL squad with technical/ recruitment and academy programs
  • Squad pruning / cost control
  • Cough and look at the floor
People looking at PPG or ladder position as some sort of threshold numbers that triggered previous sackings are missing the bigger picture.

Maybe he's not the guy to be at the helm at the end of the journey. But most of what he is doing is moving us in the right direction.
 
I have said that multiple times. Or play Spence there as we know he can beat a man, has pace, skill and is strong. Everything Johnson does not have.
Agree! If we are gonna play Johnson play him through the middle running on to things and or occupying a central defender allowing Solanke (strong) to go up against a single centre back. Having a front pair will also create so many other possibilities/space for the likes of Kulu and Maddison to exploit.
 
Agree! If we are gonna play Johnson play him through the middle running on to things and or occupying a central defender allowing Solanke (strong) to go up against a single centre back. Having a front pair will also create so many other possibilities/space for the likes of Kulu and Maddison to exploit.

Even though he scores all his goals arriving at the back post from the wing? And his second best attribute is 1st or 2nd touch crosses from the RW? And even though he's not an amazing presser, he's much better pressing from out wide instead of through the middle?
 
So either

1. the medical staff messed up

2. he ignored the medical staff.
Romero got a completely separate injury and thats just bad luck. Any player can randomly pick up an injury, it was just an unlucky coincidence that Romero who was just back from a toe injury, picked up a quad injury 10 mins into the game.

VDV was a bit of both. The medical advice was that he was ready to start but should be subbed on 70 mins as the extra 20 mins workload could be dangerous on his hamstring. Given the fact that Romero had already gone off injured and we had no proper centre back left on the bench, I think Ange might have ignored that advice and taken a gamble that VDV could finish out the game. He went down on 75 mins with a hamstring injury. If you want you can blame Ange for that but I can see his side to the story too.
 
To a degree everyone is Ange in our out dependant on results but the speed that people flip flop around must be exhausting
It's a fickle business!
Posted this in another thread.

Seems like he's in this weird position where even though he's mostly safe for the season, he won't have a leg to stand on in the summer if he doesn't deliver a cup. Or at least go on a deep run in the more prestigious EL.

They've been tolerating a mid-table form for 13 months already. I assume it's less about standing with him rather than avoiding another Mason tenure at all costs. That Conte-Stellini-Mason debacle probably left a sour taste in their mouths as well. So they're choosing to stick with him, in the hope that he'll eventually bring silverware or achieve something else that'd warrant giving him more time and support.

Seems more like a suspension of judgment rather than a vote of confidence to me. My guess is that they're treating him as an "interim-disguised as-full-timer", with burden of proof being on him to earn himself another year and -possibly- proper backing in the market. Their reluctance this summer to invest in this "project" seems to point in the same direction. They just don't want to end up like United, spending a fortune on a manager that proved to be a failure.
We did invest in the summer in terms of transfer fees. They just didn't invest in players' wages.

I don't think a "buy young prospects as they are cheaper to pay" strategy with Ange will get us back to a top 4 team that will win the odd cup. I think we need to buy established players and prospects in equal measure. And given the lopsidedness of the last windows I feel we need 3 established players now asap.
 
It's a fickle business!

We did invest in the summer in terms of transfer fees. They just didn't invest in players' wages.

I don't think a "buy young prospects as they are cheaper to pay" strategy with Ange will get us back to a top 4 team that will win the odd cup. I think we need to buy established players and prospects in equal measure. And given the lopsidedness of the last windows I feel we need 3 established players now asap.

Indeed it is but when you flip flop like that you are more like the product than the business.
 
Indeed it is but when you flip flop like that you are more like the product than the business.
I'm still Ange out don't worry. We haven't seen a convincing run of form since October 2023. If we do see a convincing run again, then something will have changed, and I'll likely be Ange in again. Right now there is no reason to believe that will happen however.

I know you put his difficulties pretty much entirely on Levy. And Levy does limit our ceiling I totally agree. But he still has one of the biggest transfer budgets in the PL and £105m pa wage budget to play with. And should be doing better with it than the past 13 months.
 
I'm still Ange out don't worry. We haven't seen a convincing run of form since October 2023. If we do see a convincing run again, then something will have changed, and I'll likely be Ange in again. Right now there is no reason to believe that will happen however.

I know you put his difficulties pretty much entirely on Levy. And Levy does limit our ceiling I totally agree. But he still has one of the biggest transfer budgets in the PL and £105m pa wage budget to play with. And should be doing better with it than the past 13 months.
I'm not convinced other managers do any better with this current group. The approach feels long term where we are blooding in young players and forcing a very attacking style of play. There is no short term gains in this model. The hope is that the young players grow and develop into top players and that once we have the top players, and a much larger squad then this relentless style of play with work.
 
I'm still Ange out don't worry. We haven't seen a convincing run of form since October 2023. If we do see a convincing run again, then something will have changed, and I'll likely be Ange in again. Right now there is no reason to believe that will happen however.

I know you put his difficulties pretty much entirely on Levy. And Levy does limit our ceiling I totally agree. But he still has one of the biggest transfer budgets in the PL and £105m pa wage budget to play with. And should be doing better with it than the past 13 months.

Where have I said that? I'll help you answer that and save you the time looking, I haven't.

Maybe he's had one of the bigger budgets and maybe he's currently underperforming our wage bracket but he finished his 1st season above that wage bracket in 5th, which was better than the position he inherited and is in the process of gutting a squad and starting again. And how much of his budget was spent on players expected to be ready to help him win now?

We are 5 points off 5th and 6 points off 4th. We are 2nd for goals scored, 3rd for goals conceded, 3rd best goal difference in the league, and we are still in all the cup competitions. And finally, I enjoy watching us play. We've had some shit results and some inconsistent performances but the overall picture is worth sticking with. That is my defense of Ange. Criticism of Levynomics is a different topic.
 
Even though he scores all his goals arriving at the back post from the wing? And his second best attribute is 1st or 2nd touch crosses from the RW? And even though he's not an amazing presser, he's much better pressing from out wide instead of through the middle?

What’s wrong with you??

Why are you using reasoning and sound logic in this place??

You’re not in Tibet anymore buddy!!
 
I'm not convinced other managers do any better with this current group. The approach feels long term where we are blooding in young players and forcing a very attacking style of play. There is no short term gains in this model. The hope is that the young players grow and develop into top players and that once we have the top players, and a much larger squad then this relentless style of play with work.
Correct.
Ange from day dot said it’s a project. Cultural change. That’s why he’s not using Levy as an excuse. Grow above that. Develop a style, ingrain it. It’s the sum of the parts.
 
Games that I explicitly mentioned about in my message were not played during injury crisis. If it was about just recent results from last 2 weeks, i guess nobody would say anything here. Myself included, even when i blame his playing style and some decisions for part of injuries.

Could you argue that he has spent a good half of his time with us without a full squad? I don't have statistics to back that up but to the naked eye, it does seem that way

This season, how many games have we had a fully fit squad? A squad where we had the ability to swap out players such as Solanke or Son without the drop off being Werner and Lankshear? (Nothing against either player) I can't think of another club that is without their defensive triangle for such a sustained period, can you? Losing the front line of Richarlison and Odobert for what seems like an entire season. Even Mickey Moore has missed what? 5 games? 10 games?

We've had horrendous luck with injuries during his time here so surely this should be taken into account, right?
 
It's a fickle business!

We did invest in the summer in terms of transfer fees. They just didn't invest in players' wages.

I don't think a "buy young prospects as they are cheaper to pay" strategy with Ange will get us back to a top 4 team that will win the odd cup. I think we need to buy established players and prospects in equal measure. And given the lopsidedness of the last windows I feel we need 3 established players now asap.
That has to be the focus. We have quite a crop of talented youngsters now, I make you right on the number of established players. Absolutely no excuses this Summer, we have the funds, the wriggle room in the wage outlay, and wriggle room in PSR.

We have our foundation for the future, we need to add to that with difference makers.

If we don't do it this Summer, I'll be firmly in the ENIC out camp. They've set everything up to feed into the playing staff, so not following through on that would be unacceptable.
 
Back
Top