If you posted that prior to Ange's appointment then fair play.Why does it matter whether I said it before we hired Ange or not, is this a court of law - what are we doing here?
Here's your 'evidence' anyway
We had this convo the other day in the ENIC thread, the word 'backed' requires context, you may point to money spent but do you think Ange would rather have Kane or the £100m he spent to replace him?
