• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%

  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%
  • Total voters
    113
Matt1882 said:
You do know you can be against both ENIC AND Ange, right?
There's no need to have to pick one or the other.
Same as the old "would you rather have top 4 or a trophy?"
There's absolutely nothing to stop a team doing both and ending the debate once and for all.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Mate been fighting with crazies on socials. They love conflating these things, progressive football and Ange like they are synonymous. Ange out means you support Levy. It's completely fraudulent.
 
glacierSpurs said:
The same pattern from the club again. Instead of investing time on new players, they came up with the same old tricks. There will be a 5th tweet comes 18 months later for the new manager.

I was almost Ange out after Everton. I'm back to Ange in now because ENIC and Levy and the board can go fuck themselves one more time. Ange may definitely be sacked afterall but my support WILL be with him till the end and NEVER be with the management of stinking cowards.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Agree with every word
 
septicsac said:
Let's not forget Conte wanted you bring a big team with him, Levy was against it. We currently have 4 positions advertised on our medical team alone. Is it remotely possible that Scrooge mcLevy has been cutting back on essential staff, maybe warm down staff, physics etc that has also impacted on our injury crisis. Let's face it he left us short on the field for yrs so why not off the field too?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
No we had an actual review and supposed overhaul of the staff under Paratici. I hate Scrooge Mclevy, but this isn't what happened. We have the best facilities in football even Conte said it. Some say too good.
 
Shotgunofmichalebrow said:
No we had an actual review and supposed overhaul of the staff under Paratici. I hate Scrooge Mclevy, but this isn't what happened. We have the best facilities in football even Conte said it. Some say too good.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
If we have the best then why are four medical positions advertised mid season, either some have been made scapegoats , positions were never filled or they were not the best and we are now seeking the best?
Facilities mat be best but background team certainly are not. Jedenik just retired so had no experience. If Mason wanted to be a first class coach he should have left the comfort of the nest and cut his teeth in a lower league. Di we have a set piece coach, since Vio left when Conte did, looking at how we defend corners I very much doubt it.
 
Aphex said:
Damn right I will support the next guy too, until he shows me he's a fucking useless charlatan. Hopefully that never happens and the next guy is the real deal and leads us to glory.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Excited Oh No GIF
 
Matt1882 said:
The City team were all looking dead on their feet through November and December. They had a lot of players injured and the ones that were playing were a mix of over used and too old (sometimes both)

They sorted it out by buying their way out of it and having some players come back.
Their injuries weren't all hamstrings and they also don't look totally uncoached. So that's where the similarities end.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Que? Who did they buy that made a difference?

Basically Foden, Dias and De Bruyne are fit now....
 
Aphex said:
This such a weird view. I know let's keep in place a fucking terrible manager leading us into relegation because ENIC and Levy are shit and we hate them. Makes no logical sense. People judging Ange should be judging him solely based on what has happened on the pitch, and on the pitch it is objectively absolutely awful and he is failing big time.

If you still aren't Ange out after that Everton game, and it only meant you were almost there, well that's crazy. Just how bad do you need it to get before it clicks that Ange is a useless fraud?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Let's let the manager potentially relegate us because ENIC only get us top 4...

Yeah it's a strange one.
 
Matt1882 said:
The City team were all looking dead on their feet through November and December. They had a lot of players injured and the ones that were playing were a mix of over used and too old (sometimes both)

They sorted it out by buying their way out of it and having some players come back.
Their injuries weren't all hamstrings and they also don't look totally uncoached. So that's where the similarities end.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
They also have a manager that’s a tiny bit better than ours
 
Raf said:
We cant be critical of Ange because it means Levy is absolved?

What kind of logic is that? It's possible to blame both.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
This is my whole annoyance of the ange in brigade, for some reason they seem to think that if you want the aussie fraud gone it means you must be some Levy/Enic lover. No they're both cunts but the owners aren't going anywhere and no other manager that has worked under the primordial dwarf has had us playing as poorly as we are
 
TonySoprano said:
Why is it baffling? We’ve been rolling like this for years. They’ll wait it out right to the end of the window to bring in some jokers on loan. Then our resident cheerleaders will get to work hyping these guys as great work and obvious improvements.

What’s baffling is that anybody expects any different. It’s like you haven’t actually been following this club in recent years.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

That's not at all how Levy has operated. His baseline since Jol has always been Europe and if a manager has looked like failing at that he has either sacked them or provided just enough transfer assistance to achieve his goal. Or both.

You are confusing Levy's goals (Europe) with our goals (success/trophies).

That's why all Conte got in the January before he was sacked was Porro on the last day whereas the season before they got Bentancur and Kulusevski because that's what was needed to get Europe (in the end it got CL so Levy was happy as a pig in shit)

Whatever peoples opinions on Postecoglou it was already out of character for Levy not to have pulled the plug before January given our league form; what is genuinely baffling is that he's doesn't appear to be urgently looking to shore up/insulate the Club from a possible relegation battle given the injury the Solanke (let alone the 10 other injuries they knew about before January).

SO yeah - Levy has gone from out of character (not sacking Ange in November/December) to outright baffling (risking relegation let alone the last chance of Europe via League Cup or EL win)
 
Chelmsford Spurs said:
This is my whole annoyance of the ange in brigade, for some reason they seem to think that if you want the aussie fraud gone it means you must be some Levy/Eric lover. No they're both cunts but the owners aren't going anywhere and no other manager that has worked under the primordial dwarf has had us playing as poorly as we are
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You'd think that blaming Levy would somehow make him sell the club the way they frame it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top