• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
Barca 3rd in the league , 7 points off top spot

Spurs 15th , 9 points off 10th

Two peas in a pod
But you have to admit that we are all really enjoying the aggressive, attacking football that we’re being treated to week in and week out. Such a joy to watch we are.
 
The stupidest question in the world of sport is when you ask a player in a press conference or after losing a match about his struggling manager. What do you expect the player to say? "He Stinks", "He is the reason of how inept we look", "He is a fraud"?

I mean \(〇_o)/

Exactly. It’s basically like a reporter coming upto you at work with 20 cameras in your face and going “so what do you think about your boss then? Do you think he should stay or get sacked?”

I mean wtf do people expect would he said? “Nah he’s shit mate I hope he fucks off” of course they are going to be polite and say all the right things.

I pay no attention to what players say unless it’s actually a bit groundbreaking and someone comes out and says something against the grain. Because then that’s actually revealing and news to be listened to.
 
I actually can’t believe what I’m seeing when I see on sky sports news that Ange has one win in 11 PL games.

I’m actually stunned he hasn’t been sacked yet. Absolutely mental. 1 win in the last 11 PL games.
Fuck me
 
which is why we shouldnt even be playing this formation and system. if son should be starting because hes ahead of the others then we are BANG in trouble.

its like the whole conte 5 at the back when it consists of dier and davies. dumb to play a formation where you are literally burning up spots. we play with 2 wingers and width gets prioritised, yet we dont have one winger at the club good enough to force this style.
Oh yeah I completely agree with that. This formation barely suits anyone in our squad.

Son is an inside forward who likes to run in behind, but Ange shunts him out on the wing.

Brennan likewise; inside forward on at Forest, dangerous on the counter; I know! Let's spend 50m on him and play him in a possession based system where he's spends the game on the touchline with no space to operate and is tasked with taking on fullbacks from a standing start (which he's crap at)! Great recruitment Spurs, great talent ID Ange.

(Also shame on those of you who spent the last few years shouting down criticism of Brennan just cos he scores the odd tap-in, when he's so obviously not at our level. Unsurprisingly it was plenty of those same names who are now the Ange-inners who evidently must watch the game with their brain disengaged. It was obvious to anyone with an iota of ball-knowledge from his Forest highlights Brennan was going to be a terrible fit in this system).

Kulu, another inside forward with talent, but Ange forces him out wide or in the #8 and he's not perfectly suited to either. Despite what people claim he still hasn't got the positioning right in midfield and we're often very open centrally when he plays there. He's best in a narrow-ish front three on the right, and another who suits counter attacking football best, hence why his best time here is still that first 6 months under Conte.

Our fullbacks are all natural wingbacks at heart. Yet Ange forces them to all play in this stupid inverted #10 role he "invented" (and nobody else uses - I wonder why) and they all look like fish out of water.

We don't have any natural single-pivot #6's. All of our DM options have drawbacks in the role. So we could do what Slot does—or Pep when he doesn't have Rodri, or Arteta, with his inverting—and play a double pivot? Nah let's force Bentancur/Bissouma into an ill-fitting role where they have too much work to do and are constantly exposed. Genius.

Ultimately, the great managers adapt their system to suit their players. Ferguson, Pep, Ancelotti - always changing their formations to get the best out of the players at hand.

Mediocre managers try to force ill-fitting players into a rigid system (Amorim, Conte). Sometimes they'll have success when all the stars align, but when it goes bad it goes really bad.

Bad managers have a shit system to begin with, are inflexible with it, and buy the wrong players for it.

Guess which one we've got.
 
Last edited:
Well it’s not just injuries it’s long term injuries like 2 months without numerous key players. Different to Bournemouth who don’t have as many key starters out and no where near as long. Plus Bournemouth don’t play as many games.

So as it’s long term it forces you to play players every three days when some are in need of rest, fatigue sets in earlier than usual and you have a decline in performance.

I suppose that’s one way the club is looking at it
 
Back
Top