I must say his points are not entirely invalid, but my very big gripe with him is despite what he always say, he actually acted differently most of the time and I am too lazy to list them anymore. But it was at the end I couldn't take it that he listed Mr Hindsight in his arguments when he was very much a Mr Excuses for far far far too many times... FFS.
However, why do I feel Levy and the higher management are buying into his sweet talks and that really really terrifies me,
You only need to go back to the last game to see numerous Mr Hinsights come out of the woods, the ones saying Van den Ven shouldn't have been subbed.
The justification for their reasoning seems to be that a highly-random and diabolicaly bad mistake led to a goal after VdV was subbed.
Like the Manager is supposed to keep our best defender on for the full game in his first match back after recovering from lengthy mutliple absences due to recurrent injuries on the off-chance that something ridiculous happens at 2-0 up with team of players that really should be good enough to see the game through?
Really?
And theres this:
"What was he saving him for?"
Fucking Frankfurt, that's what.
Last edited: