This thread is fascinating , it reads mostly as emotion v reality.
I’m not sure as to which is the primary factor behind judging Ange, but having looked at the facts.
First ten Games - 2.6 points per game.
Last 66 - 1.18 points per game.
2024 - finished outside of the Top 4, despite the highest points tally after ten games, that is (harshly) failure.
The booby prize of Europa League was something that most of us would have been angry about in previous eras, as it is falling short. THFC lost out to Villa. Should they have done…many reasons why, as opposed to it being Ange alone, but recall we lost to wolves, West Ham and Villa all in a row after the Chelsea game. And the end of season was a complete catastrophe, that he should not have been forgiven so easily for.
2025/26 is abysmal. Picking the bones out of that is pointless. finishing 17 honestly didn't feel like an "echo of glory it just felt like failure and an embarrassment.
Ange went all in on Europa League after Christmas and it was a happy ending of sorts, but then they could be seen as over celebrating when you consider the league position. Which ( non emotionally ) is the higher marker of quality.
For the little it’s worth, my view is that the club should never have hired Ange, they should never have backed him ( actually in hindsight they didn’t really ) and his sacking is justifiable without emotion involved.
There is a reasonable question as to if we could / should have given him the start of this season. Maybe In hindsight yes, but I doubt the outcome would be any different as his system was worked out 16 months before the start of this season.
This is all fair enough. Personal opinion and all that.
I'd just quibble that 250000 at the parade would suggest the Europa League meant a bit more to the vast majority of Spurs fans than a "booby prize"
Were you at Bilbao btw?