On one level, you can see the Levy logic behind appointments like Mourinho and Conte. There’s the spin that they are proven winners who guarantee success everywhere they go and I’ll have a bit of that please.
In Conte’s case, not strictly true in that Spurs are the 8th different club side he’s managed. He’s only really had success at 3 of those - Juventus , Inter and Chelsea. Those are clubs that you’re all but guaranteed success at anyway - Italy has more or less always been effectively a 3 club league and at Chelsea he inherited almost all of a title winning squad from 2014/15, who had downed tools the following season on Mourinho.
Quite apart from the negative style, likes of Mourinho and Conte are in my book just a wrong fit for Spurs, or where we were at when both were appointed. Neither have any great staying power or history of hanging around if there isn’t instant success and once things start going wrong. The best managers we’ve had over last 20 years and the best harmony and feel good factor about that place, have been Jol, Redknapp and Pochettino. Three appointments that were all heralded as underwhelming at the time, but three managers who played good attacking football and were project time managers in for the long haul.
That’s the template I felt we should have followed in each of the last 3 appointments since Pochettino. We are, where we are now though. I suspect it’s all a bit academic anyway. There will be a vacancy at Juventus shortly and I would strongly suspect that Conte will be off there like a shot.