Haha... "jesus christ on a bike", "thick as pig shit" and I believe it was you who said that "watching Spurs under Conte feels like making tea with forgetting to turn on the kettle"
. You have your way around words for sure.
And I have to say - I agree with you in the sense that we were as bad if not worse under Mou than we are now under Conte. Clearly this is not a debate about Mou being brilliant and Conte poor... both of them are shit.
But you put some things really over the top in your answers and it makes it hard to take you seriously -
3. Conceed fewer goals than under the dinosaur - that is obviously not true. In 19/20 and 20/21 we conceded 47 and 45 goals respectively. That is ~1.2 goals per game. This season we have played 23 and conceded 35. That is 1,5 goals per game. And that is flattering, considering that from 11th-23rd round we average OVER TWO GOALS per game. So we never were as shit defensively under Mou than we are under Conte.
6. Win percentage - it is bit odd to phrase it like "51% = worse than any manager over decade" ; "56% = best in 124 years" - why not compare comparables.
UPDATED figures are in fact - that Conte has won 55,07% so 38 times from 69 games. In all time list, Conte is nr 3 in overall win percentage (just 0,07% ahead of AVB) and Mou is 7th. Hardly like one being best and other worst.
When we look actually EPL games (to keep things comparable; other leagues are variable) - then stats are -
Conte - 51 games, 29 wins, 8 draws, 14 losses. Win percentage 56,86, ppg 1,86. Goal difference 102:59; on average 2 goals scored, 1,15 conceded.
Mourinho- 58 games, 27 wins, 14 draws, 17 losses. Win percentage 46,55, ppg 1,64. Goal difference 97:67; on average 1,67 goals scored, 1,15 conceded.
On Mou and Roma spending - current season on net terms they have sold for 58,1 mil more than the brought. Last year it was -110,4 mil so across his two seasons actual net spenditure of the club is 52,3 million euros.
One summer of spending 110 mil for club like Roma is hardly something so very extraordinay as you try to make it look. And from the time Mou took over AS Roma total expenditure is globally in 26th place with 135,55 mil EUR and in net spenditure (mentioned 52,3 mil) they also happen to be on 26th position. In Italy in the same period they are not even close to be biggest spenders. AC Milan has spent 123 mil EUR on net terms (and also won the league last year) with Juventus also comfortably ahead of Roma with 61,2 mil net spent. On gross spending for same period they are fourth with mentioned two heavyweights ahead and also Atalanta.roma's transfer
So your claims like he would be the biggest spender in Serie A is not true. Also just using one window as reference is pretty much pointless. You cannot make enough of a change with one window if competitors are positioned much better at the start.
