The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
let's face the reality:
last january we put in 2 players and they were 2 first XI players. the team improved all of a sudden thanks to those 2 players.
last summer we put in 1 first XI player (perisic), and we improve the bench (forster>gollini, lenglet>rodon, bissouma>ndombele, sarr>winks, richarlison>bergwijn)
if the coach does not use the bench it's clear that we worsen the results,
because we have the same squad of last year (that barely reached the top4),
and also injuries (romero, kulu, richi). add to all this the collapse of Lloris and son's performances and here we are
Ofc it was deliberate tactic sane as playing so slow in first halve every bloody game. It’s the hardman conte playing a meek style football. Basically surrender possession and ground. In fact boregate dies the same. The 2nd v Italy was exactly a spurs conte performance. No control, passing, sitting deep and hitting aimless long balls.Th match of the day footage was interesting. They showed we switched to a 451 and rigidly stuck to it.
Either the players are suffering a mystical mass delusion whereby they all had the same idea at the same time, or they were told to do that.
With who bankrolling his choice?
With the brilliant CBs we have, RB and LB will never be able to push up and play a high line. Remember the end of Poch era? We tried that and look what the results were.Then he should have dropped the 3 / 5 at the back and play 4 - 4 - 2, miracle.
You missing the Point. Levy chose the players, the managers just had to try and make things work.Ovee £200m spent in 3 windows and he couldn't find another CB, another pathetic excuse.
You missing the Point. Levy chose the players, the managers just had to try and make things work.
200 m sounds a lot of money but it needs breaking down into where it went and whether its had any or how much impact.
40 mil on Romero who was already here and 60 on Richi. Thats half of it already.
Spence, Bissouma, Gil....no impact. That don't leave much change out of 200.
Don’t respond to that twat dealer. His not a spurs fan. His like the ones who came i here towards Jose’s last days. Utter rank BS that you can’t reason with!The same as most of your posts claiming Conte is great…boring as fuck.
No offence of course
Ha!! Yeah right.You like every one else are hearing what you want to hear. The calling out was more about passing the blame.

it's not selective thinking, it's realistic thinking.It's selective thinking to suggest that if integrated better; Spence, Biss & Rich couldn't have also commonly found themselves in the starting XI as the season unfolded..... Esp. Biss (who for some was our most exciting signing this summer).
It also deprives new players of further opportunity to stake a claim for a starting role (see above).
We don't though.
We've also since added Porro and Danjuma too.
Only if you manage to stay in the cups...... We had ECL prelims last season and managed to stay in the LC longer. Come May,. we'll have played LESS games this season; not more.
Some managers would have seen fit to drop them.
Whatever sketchy excuses one chooses to hide behind; despite investment and 2 major rivals spending much of the season faltering, Conte has failed to build upon last season and thanks to his tantrum has likely blown our chance to salvage anything from this season.
(Only credible caveat that I don't begrudge him, is his health and the passing of his friends.)
Conte never used the bench though! Plenty of games we could have given minutes to players but choose not to.it's not selective thinking, it's realistic thinking.
among all those players only perisic was certain to have a place in the first XI.
I said many times that the lack of rotations was the main problem, because our level in this season could be raised only using the bench.
without the bench we are worse than last year (look the post to which I replied) so focusing on the same XI players was a suicidal strategy.
things could be different if we had improve the first XI with 2-3 players, but it wasn't our case
porro arrived in the last day of the session and we all see how his debut was, so it is clear that we should have bought him first to make the difference in the crucial match of this season (AC Milan)
the ideal was to rotate 2 players in every match from day 1.Conte never used the bench though! Plenty of games we could have given minutes to players but choose not to.
I didn’t say start ksne on the bench. I said giving minutes in 2nd where we can to the new players. I’m sure Biss, rich, spence could have been given more minutes than they actually got. Sane with skipp and Sarr.the ideal was to rotate 2 players in every match from day 1.
but tell me one elite coach that does it sistematically. coaches use their best weapons.
they don't do strategy to win the war, but the single battle, because they are judged in the short term. imagine what would have been said if we had lost a couple of games in a row with kane (fit) on the bench
It wasn’t that easy with Porro, it’s not as if he had a buy-out clause that meant we could just pay up and complete the transfer 1st Janit's not selective thinking, it's realistic thinking.
among all those players only perisic was certain to have a place in the first XI.
I said many times that the lack of rotations was the main problem, because our level in this season could be raised only using the bench.
without the bench we are worse than last year (look the post to which I replied) so focusing on the same XI players was a suicidal strategy.
things could be different if we had improve the first XI with 2-3 players, but it wasn't our case
porro arrived in the last day of the session and we all see how his debut was, so it is clear that we should have bought him first to make the difference in the crucial match of this season (AC Milan)
it's not selective thinking, it's realistic thinking.
among all those players only perisic was certain to have a place in the first XI.
I said many times that the lack of rotations was the main problem, because our level in this season could be raised only using the bench. without the bench we are worse than last year (look the post to which I replied) so focusing on the same XI players was a suicidal strategy.
things could be different if we had improve the first XI with 2-3 players, but it wasn't our case
porro arrived in the last day of the session and we all see how his debut was, so it is clear that we should have bought him first to make the difference in the crucial match of this season (AC Milan)