• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Brennan Johnson

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

you aint gonna win wars with wimps, hes gotta go. bottled a few duals yesterday, that will surely anger frank, as it should do! it should infuriate everyone at the club when they see someone ducking duals.

hes the only player at the club that does this now, its proper deflating to everyone, cant be having that.
 
The key part was "after 2 years depreciation". Typically players value depreciates over the course of their contract, also known as player amortization. For example, if a new player is signed for £100m on a five-year contract, amortisation means that fee is listed as £20m per year for five years in the books. Johnson signed for us for £47.5M pounds and signed a 6-year contract. So if we got £31.5M for him in the last window we'd have balanced the books on him. I actually think that, as his stock was high coming out of last season, and there were a dearth of forwards available this summer, we'd have easily got more than that. Newcastle offered £55m for Wolve's Strand Larsen in August despite him only joining them from Celta Viga for £23M in July.
Ok yeah, I could see us getting 30m for him.

Thing is Johnson's a weird profile. 55m for Strand Larsen is nuts but he's a PL proven number 9 and a profile many teams want. Equally Elanga who they paid load for is a much more typical pacey winger that neatly fits into their system. I still don't really know what Johnson is: he's not a 9, 10 and lacks most of the qualities you'd want from a conventional winger. I guess a wide forward/second striker who is only good in the box or in open space?

I really struggle to see any top 10 team like Newcastle even looking twice at him as you've either gotta kinda build your attack to cater to his specific strengths or play him off a striker in a front 2. Would have to be a Brentford/Wolves/West Ham type club I think.
 
The key part was "after 2 years depreciation". Typically players value depreciates over the course of their contract, also known as player amortization. For example, if a new player is signed for £100m on a five-year contract, amortisation means that fee is listed as £20m per year for five years in the books. Johnson signed for us for £47.5M pounds and signed a 6-year contract. So if we got £31.5M for him in the last window we'd have balanced the books on him. I actually think that, as his stock was high coming out of last season, and there were a dearth of forwards available this summer, we'd have easily got more than that. Newcastle offered £55m for Wolve's Strand Larsen in August despite him only joining them from Celta Viga for £23M in July.
The depreciation is only relevant to the P and L and FFP accounting. Levy always had high prices in his head regardless of this, hence us never selling players. Hopefully we are more comfortable taking a hit on price paid and look at in deprecation terms rather than original buy price / Levy’s perceived value
 
The depreciation is only relevant to the P and L and FFP accounting. Levy always had high prices in his head regardless of this, hence us never selling players. Hopefully we are more comfortable taking a hit on price paid and look at in deprecation terms rather than original buy price / Levy’s perceived value
Yeah when you boil it down you're still taking a 20m hit on a peak age player. You expect an older player to depreciate and cost that in when buying them.

When you buy a 22 year old you'd be hoping they at least retain their value.
 
Based on his general play no other club in their right mind will want him and certainly not for the 30million that is being bandied around.
Frank has already seen enough of Johnson to ensure he is not in his plans.
Playing with Johnson is like being down to 10 players.
Enough is enough cut our losses and let him go for whatever we can get.
 
Ok yeah, I could see us getting 30m for him.

Thing is Johnson's a weird profile. 55m for Strand Larsen is nuts but he's a PL proven number 9 and a profile many teams want. Equally Elanga who they paid load for is a much more typical pacey winger that neatly fits into their system. I still don't really know what Johnson is: he's not a 9, 10 and lacks most of the qualities you'd want from a conventional winger. I guess a wide forward/second striker who is only good in the box or in open space?

I really struggle to see any top 10 team like Newcastle even looking twice at him as you've either gotta kinda build your attack to cater to his specific strengths or play him off a striker in a front 2. Would have to be a Brentford/Wolves/West Ham type club I think.
Remember that Newcastle had already lost Callum Wilson and Isak was on strike, and they were sitting on a potential 125M windfall. They went into the last days of the window with no forwards and Gordon (their emergency makeshift) suspended for 3 games.

My original point was that we are bad at selling players at the right time. Johnson's stock will never be higher than it was after winning the Europa League final and hitting 18 goals last season. Even if we took a depreciation loss on him. Go back and read the comments from earlier in the window - the majority on here were outraged at even the suggestion of selling him.
 
The depreciation is only relevant to the P and L and FFP accounting. Levy always had high prices in his head regardless of this, hence us never selling players. Hopefully we are more comfortable taking a hit on price paid and look at in deprecation terms rather than original buy price / Levy’s perceived value

That is exactly the point I was making. Hopefully Levy is no longer involved we will not keep players like Johnson (or Gil, or Ndombele or Reguilon etc.) around for years paying their salaries when they are not contributing.
 
He’s dreadful. Of course he’s not going to be happy with a bit part role. Kudus has clearly taken him spot
Yes the early signs are good for Kudus whether he keeps that up time will tell, I’m not defending Johnson he’s lightweight and certainly not a 90minutes guy but getting on his back is no helping in any way he’s a Tottenham player he should be supported wasn’t his fault he’s been landed with that price tag.
 
No I don't.

The guy gives 100% and more, he has skills, but he is a headless chicken most of the time, making the wrong decisions time and time again. He loses the ball an awful lot, and he is just so predictable and easy to defend against. Especially on the right.

He just ain't good enough. If you could merge, Johnson and Kulu, that would be great. Kuluson.

It's just a shame that those two players have serious flaws you just can't ignore.
Clueless!
 
Yes the early signs are good for Kudus whether he keeps that up time will tell, I’m not defending Johnson he’s lightweight and certainly not a 90minutes guy but getting on his back is no helping in any way he’s a Tottenham player he should be supported wasn’t his fault he’s been landed with that price tag.
No-one gets in his back, his song is commonly sung. He’s awful. Shit on the right, even worse on the left. No effort, no flair, just a brilliant knack of scoring goals. Sell
 
Considering he scored the winning goal in our only trophy for 15 years he’s done remarkably to be so thoroughly rejected by this fan base.

That’s a shocking state to be in.
Yep look at Richarlison. This fan base is incredibly sentimental half of these donuts were raging at me in the Europa win aftermath for saying Ange was 100% gone. Absolutely incandescent with anger at the truth. So for Johnson to have so many openly wanting him gone is a remarkable 'achievement'.
 
Back
Top