For all those saying when was the last time he played well, he was sensational against Bournemouth.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Without context? Describing actions from the game is context. Showcasing that we were very poor offensively without him is context. Telling you that he assisted a winning goal after 1 minute of game time in his comeback game is context.Stats without context are great
1. No-one? Eh, yes, some are saying that he should be benched. Do you read the forum?No-one is saying he's terrible and should be benched but he's been nowhere near what's expected of him recently.
Has it? Why? He doesn't stand out like Alli, Dembele and Kane at the moment, but afaic he provides the calmness and overview in our attacks, while Alli and Lamela provide the more direct style of play. They compliment each other greatly. Evidenced by the table and goal difference.His play outside of set pieces has been subpar...
Yeah, exposed Walker, because 1) he shouldn't be playing at the right side in the first place, and 2) he's not exactly a beast defensively. Although he does actually tackle a lot this season. Did you see him tackle Wanyama against Saints? I did, cause I was watching the guy.. Funny, really. I ask you guys if you actually watch Eriksen when we play. You then counter that question because I also use stats to prove that you're wrong about him!?Watch the game with your eyes and not just through numbers. He left Walker exposed for long periods yesterday whilst Lamela has been great at covering and helping his full back. Might be a little harsh but he has the capability to be so much better.
Agreed.Might be a little harsh but he has the capability to be so much better.
Without context? Describing actions from the game is context. Showcasing that we were very poor offensively without him is context. Telling you that he assisted a winning goal after 1 minute of game time in his comeback game is context.
1. No-one? Eh, yes, some are saying that he should be benched. Do you read the forum?
2. What's expected of him, then? You must have the answer, since you can claim that he does not live up to it.
Has it? Why? He doesn't stand out like Alli, Dembele and Kane at the moment, but afaic he provides the calmness and overview in our attacks, while Alli and Lamela provide the more direct style of play. They compliment each other greatly. Evidenced by the table and goal difference.
Furthermore, funny that people always criticized his corners. Now he's getting loads of assists from them, but does that get a positive mention? Nope, now he's poor on the ball instead. Jeeeez. ochfacepalm:
Yeah, exposed Walker, because 1) he shouldn't be playing at the right side in the first place, and 2) he's not exactly a beast defensively. Although he does actually tackle a lot this season. Did you see him tackle Wanyama against Saints? I did, cause I was watching the guy.. Funny, really. I ask you guys if you actually watch Eriksen when we play. You then counter that question because I also use stats to prove that you're wrong about him!?
Agreed.
Are you retarded? Showcasing that we were poor offensively without him EARLY into the season where our entire team was disjointed is context? Do you even listen to yourself? The team was nowhere near settled like how it is now.
Some on the forum are saying he should be benched.. go and respond to them then. No-one in this thread has said that so trying to respond to it here is moronic
Ah yes.. so things couldn't be better? We're playing as well as we ever could. LOL.. he provides fucking calmness? This is a player who can propel us to new heights
I don't give a shit about what other people say about his corners. I've never criticized them so fuck knows why you're mentioning that to me. You seem to love talking about 'people' and what these mysterious people think.
Ah yes.. he tackled Wanyama so his defensive work is great! Great analysis. That one time he tackled Wanyama was class. They should sign you up to replace Gary Neville with that level of analysis. He exposed Walker but hey he tackled Wanyama last week so questioning his defensive qualities is completely out of the question. You're asking me if I watch the games like I don't go to most games
Thought he did well when he came on today, created a good chance for Son as well. If the runs are made in behind the defence, Eriksen will make the pass
When we took Carroll off for Son and went two up top and tried to go a bit more attacking he basically was playing there, Dier stepped back up a bit as more of a deep lying DM and Chadli and Lamela played more narrow.I quite liked the formation we played and I was intrigued to see how Eriksen would have done in Carrolls role. A bit deeper and licence to sort of dictate from central midfield. Playing alongside someone strong defensively like a Dembele whilst Lamela, Alli and Kane attack in front of them could have worked out really well.
I guess even through what we'd thought as bad form, this is why he was still starting games: