And this is no good for a club like Spurs who apparently have a higher ambition.
Loaning out a consistent man like Pierre but putting so much faith in Kulusevski who is a nearly man is no good. We just dont have the luxury for nearly men.
But a guy like pierre puts a shift in and knows his role and is more valuable to a club over the course of a season.
3 years on and i still dont know what Kulusevski does or is.
How to say that you know absolutely nothing about football without actually saying that
"consistent man like Pierre" and "nearly man Kulusevski"
HAHAHAH. I am almost falling off chair laughing.
You are comparing PEH who has never been able to even make a turn with a ball under pressure to Kulusevski that can turn and dribble past 2 or 3 players at one time?!?
PEH is 29 and he quite frankly has never in his life been top half EPL level player. He managed to get a run for us in one of the absolutely worst spells for us, playing for managers who were panically afraid to have possession. Quite frankly Southampton has always been his level. He was unwnated for us and no one would even pay 15 mil for him. Yes, he had decent outings for us where he covered a lot of ground. He put up quite a decent fight in some games. But he had games where he was only pointing fingers and hiding from the ball like it was threatening to kill his family.
Kulu is 24 (!) and has been arguably Spurs player of the season so far, posting best numbers in TOP5 leagues in some aspects. He has ten times the ball control and football brain that PEH does.
I mean you are basically claiming that Skipp is better CM than Modric here
Stop it, you are killing me
EDIT: P.S - yes- Kulu had a shit game against Crystal Palace. I agree with that. Just like literally every single player on the pitch that day. It does not mean that everyone who played have always been, are and always will be shit players. It was collectively shit game, including for Kulus part.
