It's just an issue of terminology, but I'd suggest that these clubs are overpaying as opposed to us underpaying.
However the end result is the same, our players can look at others elsewhere and decide that they could be earning more.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Player Destiny Udogie
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
However the end result is the same, our players can look at others elsewhere and decide that they could be earning more.
Under ENIC , we'd have a completely different squad every season
Is it even about what a player should be on?
Or
More about what the market decides they could be on?
You need a balance between competing with the market to win and sticking to your own ideas and structures.
Levynomics has always been far more leaned towards sticking to his model, even if that costs us when it comes to competing against the market to win.
Yay x 100000000000000000000000.
Instead sign me a guy who fights for the team, leaves it all out on the pitch, loves defending, doesn't just run forward for the sake of it, can pass, cross...
True however in this instance Destiny could be on double his wage, what's stopping him with being linked to City or them being interested? All they're going to do is offer more anyway if they really want him.
That's the reality of being part of a football food chain, players can always be offered more money if a club really wants them...KDB and Salah can Triple their wages playing in Saudi if they want to for example, it's what it is
True however in this instance Destiny could be on double his wage, what's stopping him with being linked to City or them being interested? All they're going to do is offer more anyway if they really want him.
That's the reality of being part of a football food chain, players can always be offered more money if a club really wants them...KDB and Salah can Triple their wages playing in Saudi if they want to for example, it's what it is
But they would then have to pay more than they maybe want to or more than other options on the market.
That’s the nature of competing against the market.
They're paying Gvardiol £200k a week mate, if they really want a player then they'd have no qualms in getting them as they have the capacity to pay more.
Not performing under this clown of a manager you mean. Who rushed him back after his operation in the summer, played him every game despite having Spence there before the player then broke down again, got injury after injury and couldnt retain form at all. Then lost confidence.
He's a good player. Don't be fooled into judging him now. Remember Rose and Walker pre Poch, it isnt such a dissimilar situation.
Hope you are right.
Was exceptional last season, not very good this season but no one has been, it’s a keep for me
Don't get the excitement around selling Udogie. As if we are going to reinvest the money in a top left back like Ait Nouri, Robinson or Kerkez 
It'll be Walker getting replaced by Aurier all over again or even worse!
Spence would end up as our only senior left back who's not even a left back, and we'd buy a totally unexposed young left back as Udogie's replacement (who we probably loan out in year 1) and hope that in 2 years he becomes as good as Udogie and we can sell him for profit!
I see fans getting excited about the idea of selling Romero. Same way I saw fans excited about selling Kane for 100. Its never good to be selling starting players.
It'll be Walker getting replaced by Aurier all over again or even worse!Spence would end up as our only senior left back who's not even a left back, and we'd buy a totally unexposed young left back as Udogie's replacement (who we probably loan out in year 1) and hope that in 2 years he becomes as good as Udogie and we can sell him for profit!
I see fans getting excited about the idea of selling Romero. Same way I saw fans excited about selling Kane for 100. Its never good to be selling starting players.
Don't get the excitement around selling Udogie. As if we are going to reinvest the money in a top left back like Ait Nouri, Robinson or Kerkez
Spence would end up as our only senior left back who's not even a left back, and we'd buy a totally unexposed young left back as Udogie's replacement (who we probably loan out in year 1) and hope that in 2 years he becomes as good as Udogie and we can sell him for profit!
I see fans getting excited about the idea of selling Romero. Same way I saw fans excited about selling Kane for 100. Its never good to be selling starting players.
Fans always do this, when our players aren't playing well they're ready to throw them on the scrapheap not taking into account the circumstances of playing under a manager who hasn't set the team up properly and a set of players losing confidence and many of them mentally checked out and all of a sudden they're shit.
Well, I’m not usually but I can’t judge anyone playing in this system and with these tactics.
In the "ruined by brainless Angeball" bucket for me. Give him a competent manager and another season.
I'd be really suspect of the fact that Pep thinks he can be part of cites future. Because looking at this post from
Jaynola
it's identical to posts about Rose and Walker, when Pochettino arrives... buy a coach who can actually coch football not whatever the fuck Postecoglou is doing and let him decide who he wants to keep.Don't get carried away here we will probably lose Cutey hopefully after a Madridian bidding war.
Next up is Kulu some Italian team really want him
Then Udogie
How many first team players can we lose in one go.
One or two maybe
Next up is Kulu some Italian team really want him
Then Udogie
How many first team players can we lose in one go.
One or two maybe