The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Like so many others whose only excellent performances at the highest level have also only ever come under Ange.Love Djed. Worried about him being dragged into the gutter by Ange like so many others
Like so many others whose only excellent performances at the highest level have also only ever come under Ange.
Udogie, Sarr, you could argue Van de Ven and Porro, these guys peaks as footballers, the reason we think they can play in the first place, is because of what they've done under Ange.
The tactics fail to get sufficient results for the team, sure, perfectly fair argument. He's broken players physically, hard to refute.
But on an individual level him turning players into worse versions of themselves just doesn't seem accurate at all and yet people keep saying so.
He absolutely is. But "before" was last season under Ange.
Ange has been a pretty good steward of the squad as a portfolio of assets.
By accomplished do you mean that ten game run before other teams had look under the hood. And worked it out...them games are doing so much heavy lifting. Djed was never deadwood just ignored by small men.He absolutely is. But "before" was last season under Ange.
So much of the anti-Ange invective has come to be dead-certain claims that it would be impossible in a trillion years for Ange to accomplish things which he already accomplished last season.
As a matter of how fans ought to perceive him but ESPECIALLY as a way of understanding how Levy sees him, I think people need to acknowledge that (injury management aside) Ange has been a pretty good steward of the squad as a portfolio of assets.
High priced players have become totally useless deadwood that can't be on the field and can't be sold at any price all the time under previous managers. Not only has that not happened under Ange, he's brought prior deadwood back to life, see Djed.
I take no position on whether it is BECAUSE of Ange.You think our squad value has increased in this time, because of Ange?
I’m not sure about that at all. They may have burned brightly. But they have dimmed dramatically. It’s compound effect.Like so many others whose only excellent performances at the highest level have also only ever come under Ange.
Udogie, Sarr, you could argue Van de Ven and Porro, these guys peaks as footballers, the reason we think they can play in the first place, is because of what they've done under Ange.
The tactics fail to get sufficient results for the team, sure, perfectly fair argument. He's broken players physically, hard to refute.
But on an individual level him turning players into worse versions of themselves just doesn't seem accurate at all and yet people keep saying so.
10 games has been well and truly debunked.By accomplished do you mean that ten game run before other teams had look under the hood. And worked it out...them games are doing so much heavy lifting. Djed was never deadwood just ignored by small men.
That 16 game stretch what was the wins loses draws ratio...because 'better' seems a stretch. How many back to back wins we rack up.10 games has been well and truly debunked.
We had 16 game stretch from December that was better and we did it without VDV, Romero, Son, Sarr and Bissouma
The thing about the 10 games was it’s our best ever start to a season in the PL so people fixated on it and started to believe we could really challenge.
Truth is some of the football we played at the start of this season was better than the football we played in those 10 games.
W10 D3 L3, but we didn't really beat much of anybody nor did we advance in the table.That 16 game stretch what was the wins loses draws ratio...because 'better' seems a stretch. How many back to back wins we rack up.
All five of those players started in said tonking though.We had 16 game stretch from December that was better and we did it without VDV, Romero, Son, Sarr and Bissouma
He is defensively terrible he can't head ball constantly gets by passed with flighted deliveries out to the wing. He is a bang average fullback. He'd have to be David Beckham with the ball to warrant a place above Spence. It's not even close. But he can ping a ball and score the odd screamer. He is vastly over rated.Porro has a better delivery and shot than Spence.
Early days for Spence.
Yep that's what I recall and we certainly were not 'better' than the first ten in any way I went to a lot of those games home and away.W10 D3 L3, but we didn't really beat much of anybody nor did we advance in the table.
We did deliver a tonking at Villa Park I suppose.
All five of those players started in said tonking though.
He is defensively terrible he can't head ball constantly gets by passed with flighted deliveries out to the wing. He is a bang average fullback. He'd have to be David Beckham with the ball ti warrant a place above Spence. It's not even close. But he can ping a ball and score the odd screamer. He is vastly over rated.
Same-ish levels we'd been at for a number of years.Yep that's what I recall abd we certainly were not 'better' than the first ten in any way I went to a lot of those games home and away.
He has created assists with some outrageous passes of the outside of his boot. I'm sorry but he's been better than. Porro in everything that matters.It's early days for Spence - in our system of the fbs going forward a lot - you need to produce something offensively.
Spence has looked good- but his final ball and choice made going forward have not been fantastic.
I think we have good options