He's done quite well this season but DCL would've been a catastrophically bad signing 2 years ago. He'd had persistent injuries for 2 seasons running and scored 7 goals in all comps over that period (and 3 of those were pens). Not to mention he was statistically one of the worst finishers in the league about 3 seasons running. I remember him famously breaking his duck against us (of course) after a horrific dry spell.Because £65m was his release clause (was actually £55m with £10m add ons)
Some fans raised eyebrows, some didn't...some people would have raised eyebrows if we went for DCL and Welbeck, people would have moaned regardless.
Yeah so basically we don't know how any of these players would have worked out, going by our transfer activity and how our players have fared over the past few years then the logical conclusion is that they would have probably gone the same way or similar to Solanke.
Solanke's been shit but people would've quite rightly gone mental if we'd gone for DCL.
IIRC it was quite a tricky market for strikers. Maaaaaybe we could've got Alvarez if we'd really pushed the boat out while Osimhen would've demanded very silly wages to the extent even the uber rich PL clubs didn't go there. Solanke was a bit of a bland compromise signing that I didn't love, but not sure there were too many great options on the market.
We should've pushed hard for Alvarez but suspect he always would've preferred Atleti.


