How can I put this?on most of those points I can really see where you're coming from and agree, it's just some of your previous statements muddied the water and seem to be fuelled by anger, rather than fact.
That Luka Modric link you provided proves that the player engineered a move but Levy refused to sell to a competitor, especially after the Arnesen debacle, and not for a poultry £22m. Both parties agreed he would stay one more year, and be sold abroad if the right offer came in. It did and we got £13m more than Chelsea offered.
Players will always claim ambition to move to a bigger club, and rarely admit it's for the money as it's bad PR and doesn't build a good relationship with the fans. Up until recently we've been a stepping stone for players, it's the sad truth that all bar a few teams have to cope with. In recent years the only player we've successfully held onto is Kane, and that might come back and cost us... It was a bold statement and whilst most fan were annoyed with Kane, Levy stuck to his word and didn't sell.
Under ENIC Spurs sell all their best players or the best players run their contracts down and leave.
None of us know the finer details of the deals that take our players away.
What we can guess is that the players leave for more money first and foremost and if winning trophies is more realistic at the new club that is a bonus.
Those of us who are sick of ENIC want them to either behave like the clubs our best players always leave us to join or sell the club to owners who will pay the best wages, to the best players, and help Spurs to compete and win trophies.
After 20 years ENIC can no longer claim bad luck or greedy players have cost Spurs success.
It's ENIC.
English National INVESTMENT Company.
An investment company that don't invest enough in football players salaries.