I honestly don't see how you can accuse me of cherry picking & questioning my logic and in the same post with a straight face hold up the claim that City had no net spend as a shining exampleYour not using logic, your picking and choosing figures and ignoring ones you don't like.
I somehow doubt you would fit into the Russell school of logic with some of your utter jiber jabber.
You talk about spending huge amounts, oil money and changing landscape. Well city won the league with having no net spend last year just a very good manager, Newcastle got cl without a spend significantly different from ours. Liverpool have spent less than us over the years, just left it to klopp. then we look at west ham and Everton????? Apparently you neither understand logic or football .....
You say "City won the league with having no net spend last year just a very good manager"
I think they have a great manager btw
Now as for oil money
So you are saying the Sheiks coming in had no impact on the league or them as a club?
They have spent billions to get to the position where they have by far the best squad in World football.
But that doesn't matter as apparently they had no net spend last year
They are being investigated for dodgy payments & corruption btw so not sure if we should 100% trust their accounting?
Rumours that the haaland contract deal may actually have cost more than our whole squad btw.
You are saying Abramovich and his billions of free money pumped into Chelsea also had no impact on landscape?
You think they are winning loads of titles, domestic cups & Champions League trophies under Ken Bates?
Newcastle were not getting Champs league this season without the oil money fact.
Howe has done very well, they are ahead of schedule.
Liverpool have a very good manager & stability. I'm am not denying that.
They are a bigger club than us.
They failed to get champs league this season.
They have spent more that us since he took over.
Last edited: