Yep, I agree.
They have done some good things but that doesn't give them a free pass on having us treading water as underachievers for quarter of a century.
Statements like this sometimes reflect a disconnect between reality and nostalgia.
The reality is, including LCs which I have my very poor opinion of, Spurs have won 17 trophies in 142 years. Most of those came from 3 bursts: 5 in the 60s, 3 in the early 70s, 3 in the early 80s.
Even if you spread them out equally, Spurs should have won 3 trophies so far under ENIC and they've won 1. Underachieving, yes.
But we've been in enough finals that the players and managers employed
could have made up that margin.
In fact, because it makes a great comparison:
Golden Quarter 1960-1985: 12 Finals, 6 Semis (10 Cups)
ENIC 2000-2024: 6 Finals, 8 Semis (1 Cup)
So the numbers of Semis isn't markedly different between the eras - 18 to 14. The most significant difference is, during the Golden Quarter if we got to a Semi we generally won the trophy (10/18). During ENIC's era we've typically lost the Semi, and if not we've lost the final (1/14).
All the blame for failing in the last 90-180 minutes of a tournament can't fall on the bald guy sitting in a room a couple hundred feet away from the pitch. The players and managers were good enough to get to the cusp of glory...they really should have been able to get across the line more than 1 out of 14 tries.
ENIC have certainly presided over a disappointing era, but people need to stop acting as if it's an unmitigated disaster which has disgraced a once colossal all-triumphant club. In 21 months under ENIC, Poch lost as many title races as Tottenham have ever won in its history.