With the bookmakers, we were underdogs in all apart from Pompey
Bookmakers shmookmakers.
We were good enough to win all those games.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
With the bookmakers, we were underdogs in all apart from Pompey
‘People sad cos no trophies’
Yep. The literal measure of success for any top six club. Trophies. Namely the big two. But in general yes, that’s the point and what we all play for.
The way you brush it off so flippantly is so weird. Other clubs are in crisis if they have five years of no silverware. We are just in normal service and fans like you sort of just think this is ok.
I'm just not so sad about it that I act all outraged and feel the need to insult people because of it.
You do you brah.
Ok Mr non match going, wind up merchant.
Yeah ok but ‘people sad because no trophies’ is an insanely flippant way to dismiss winning basically nothing as an established top 6 team.
You don’t need to insult anyone (although you do, just for different reasons lmao) or be outraged but you could stop acting like it isn’t a big deal.
Yeah ok but ‘people sad because no trophies’ is an insanely flippant way to dismiss winning basically nothing as an established top 6 team.
You don’t need to insult anyone (although you do, just for different reasons lmao) or be outraged but you could stop acting like it isn’t a big deal.
Would have to have historical data which doesn't exist to know how that compares to the Golden Quarter.With the bookmakers, we were underdogs in all apart from Pompey
League form wouldn't come into it. We were well known as being a cup team.Would have to have historical data which doesn't exist to know how that compares to the Golden Quarter.
In many of our Cup winning seasons in the 70s and 80s we were dreadful in the league. Thus I would expect we were not favourites in plenty of those runs as well.
In any event, 1 trophy from 14 Semis is poor performance from the players and management. If you're good enough to reach 14 Semis, you really ought to have a few trophies just by luck.
My point wasn't specifically that ENIC aren't to blame, they 100% share in the blame. But they're not solely to blame, and the characterization of the period as an abnormally disastrous lack of trophies isn't really accurate to club history either. If we somehow managed the Europa + League Cup double this season, it would immediately put ENIC right back on par for the course.
He is?Say what you like about Levy/Enic....
he's pocketing alot of money...
Tried to poke holes in this looking at 1981, but christ what a fortunate string of draws:League form wouldn't come into it. We were well known as being a cup team.
We were still a quality cup team in that quarter with world class players and were likely still favourites, rather than underpaid, plucky little triersWould have to have historical data which doesn't exist to know how that compares to the Golden Quarter.
In many of our Cup winning seasons in the 70s and 80s we were dreadful in the league. Thus I would expect we were not favourites in plenty of those runs as well.
In any event, 1 trophy from 14 Semis is poor performance from the players and management. If you're good enough to reach 14 Semis, you really ought to have a few trophies just by luck.
My point wasn't specifically that ENIC aren't to blame, they 100% share in the blame. But they're not solely to blame, and the characterization of the period as an abnormally disastrous lack of trophies isn't really accurate to club history either. If we somehow managed the Europa + League Cup double this season, it would immediately put ENIC right back on par for the course.
Bookmakers are professionals that win out overall so if you ignore their intelligence, you are an idiot. They get it wrong of course but that always net out as winnersBookmakers shmookmakers.
We were good enough to win all those games.
This is a ridiculous characterization.We were still a quality cup team in that quarter with world class players and were likely still favourites, rather than underpaid, plucky little triers
Bookmakers are professionals that win out overall so if you ignore their intelligence, you are an idiot. They get it wrong of course but that always net out as winners
Also a mischaracterization. We've sold players to Madrid and Bayern. There's not a club in England that has consistently successfully spurned offers from those 2. Walker was sold because he basically downed tools during the season telling Poch his heart wasn't in the fight anymore because he'd already decided he was going to join City - before an official offer had even been made.It’s not far wrong. Any time we develop a genuinely Elite player (not just someone the fans think is elite because he strung together 4 good games) that player leaves to go win stuff and get paid fairly.
Also a mischaracterization. We've sold players to Madrid and Bayern. There's not a club in England that has consistently successfully spurned offers from those 2. Walker was sold because he basically downed tools during the season telling Poch his heart wasn't in the fight anymore because he'd already decided he was going to join City - before an official offer had even been made.
Liverpool have habitually sold their best players and have a net spend less than ours - managed to win things.
This is my problem with the #ENICOUT crowd - the continual exaggeration. Like I said, yes ENIC bear a lot of responsibility for the disappointment of the past 25 years - but the players and managers had opportunities yet spit the bit. Even still we're 1 cup double away from ENIC being 100% on par with the club's typical silverware haul. So it's not as if the drought is wildly out of character for the club.